Teams

MI-Double Trouble-Chang

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 5.0

18 players · average NTRP 2.56 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-14vs MC-ManickamLost 01
L#3 DoublesBryn Peterson / Huyen Hoang vs Travis Glover / KAYOKO SHIBUE3-6, 2-6
2025-10-25vs WSC-Fast & Flurrious-DayLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Wenzel / Huyen Hoang vs Sidharth Panicker / Jenjira Hellers4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Peha / Bryn Peterson vs Sihui Wang / Shobit Beltangdy0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Peha / Kelly Richards vs Dana Day / Aidan Plunkitt2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-10-19vs BC-Drop Shots-SmallLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoseph Notaro / Eliza Notaro vs Brooke Small / Christopher Small5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Wenzel / Justyna King vs Sibylle Brown / John Manning6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Peha / Robert Peha vs Jennifer Strelow / Gary Fowler3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-11vs AYTC-Raindrop Dropshot-PenaWon 21
W#1 DoublesMindy Rowe / Chad Rowe vs Joseph Pena / Roseanna Cen2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnnie Cudney / Jeffrey Wenzel vs Jennifer Sei / Will Sather5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesConnie Manson / Shaz Qadeer vs Devpreet Chahal / Randy Fan6-4, 6-2
2025-10-03vs NWW-ETC-BoxLost 02
L#1 DoublesVarun Kamat / Kelly Kuhn vs Alix Jansma / Jeremy Newton-Smith2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Peha / Donna Peha vs Pallavi Taleppadi / Ravdeep Pasricha0-6, 2-6
2025-09-28vs BTA-Longhorns-HuangLost 12
L#1 DoublesOliver Chang / Kelly Kuhn vs Cathy Wong / Wei Zhao5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesConnie Manson / Varun Kamat vs Hongjuan Zhang / Kunal Mahajan3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesHuyen Hoang / Bryn Peterson vs Asako Endo / Jason Li7-6, 6-4
2025-09-13vs ETC-DuLost 12
L#1 DoublesOliver Chang / Huyen Hoang vs Zeshi Du / Chen Ella Sun2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEliza Notaro / Joseph Notaro vs Yu Wang / Aiyana Huang6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBryn Peterson / Justyna King vs Yuzhou Wu / Yuan Sun2-6, 0-6
2025-09-07vs WSC-Fast & Flurrious-DayWon 21
W#1 DoublesMindy Rowe / Chad Rowe vs Jenjira Hellers / Shobit Beltangdy7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAnnie Cudney / Ryan Cudney vs Dana Day / Aidan Plunkitt7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesConnie Manson / Varun Kamat vs Jane Doe / Sagar Khasnis6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Robert Peha
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Connie Manson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Jeffrey Wenzel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.46
Shaz Qadeer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Oliver Chang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.41
Justyna King
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.36
Annie Cudney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.33
Varun Kamat
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.29
Mindy Rowe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.24
Kelly Kuhn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.24
Kelly Richards
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.17
Eliza Notaro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.09
Chad Rowe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.06
Huyen Hoang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.00
Bryn Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.92
Donna Peha
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Joseph Notaro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ryan Cudney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mindy Rowe + Chad Rowe404 matchesnot enough data
Mindy Rowe + Oliver Chang213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Peha
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.36
3
Connie Manson
9W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
2.5
Jeffrey Wenzel
26W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%54%46%
2.48
Shaz Qadeer
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%61%39%
2.46
2.5
Oliver Chang
29W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%73%27%
2.41
Justyna King
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
2.5
Annie Cudney
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Varun Kamat
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
Mindy Rowe
15W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
Kelly Kuhn
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Kelly Richards
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Eliza Notaro
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Chad Rowe
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Huyen Hoang
3W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.06
2.5
Bryn Peterson
12W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Donna Peha
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Joseph Notaro
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ryan Cudney
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.