Teams

Moreland

2024 Anne Arundel Singles · Anne Arundel Singles 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-11-01vs LaabsLost 01
L#2 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Xenia Baranova4-6, 2-6
2024-10-26vs LaabsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMaria Birnkammer vs Belen Jonker7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Bari Abensohn6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-23Won 10
W#2 SinglesMaria Birnkammer vs Amy Dawson6-4, 6-4
2024-10-20vs LaabsLost 01
L#1 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Xenia Baranova7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2024-10-16vs LaabsSplit 11
W#2 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Amy Dawson6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesMaria Birnkammer vs Dawn Orso4-6, 5-7
2024-10-03vs LaabsLost 01
L#1 SinglesDeborah Greenside vs Xenia Baranova1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-09-24Split 11
L#1 SinglesDeborah Greenside vs Stephanie Riley6-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Amy Dawson6-2, 6-2
2024-09-21vs LaabsLost 02
L#1 SinglesDeborah Greenside vs Xenia Baranova0-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Heather Sutton4-6, 1-6
2024-09-09Split 11
L#1 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Heather Sutton1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMarie Sokoloff vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Jennifer Coady
published
3.69
Kelsey Forbes
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.56
Joanne Connelly
published
3.55
Deborah Greenside
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Marie Sokoloff
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Maria Birnkammer
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Lezlie Moreland
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Deeann Coe
published 3.5
2.94
Bridget Kelly
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lezlie Moreland + Maria Birnkammer5352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Coady
14W–5L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Kelsey Forbes
140W–112L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.69
Joanne Connelly
2W–13L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Deborah Greenside
139W–167L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Marie Sokoloff
276W–199L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Maria Birnkammer
97W–141L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Lezlie Moreland
157W–166L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Deeann Coe
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Bridget Kelly
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.