← Teams

MAC-Leedy (7.0)

2021 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Joe Conyard
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.48
Jeanette Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Sara Crate
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Jeffrey Bayless
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Brooke Daniel
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
—
Kayla Casebeer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Melissa Gibson
published 3.5
3.18
Rudy Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Zachary Wright
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.04
Catherine Leedy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.86
Matthew Casimo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
Alan Peters
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results6 ties
2021-05-09Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesZachary Wright / Catherine Leedy vs Susan Rolfe / William Wang1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSara Crate / Walt Crate vs Kirk Planck / Cassia Carpio6-0, 4-3
L#3 DoublesMatthew Casimo / Jeanette Thomas vs Suresh Chand / Rie Sasakawa6-3, 6-3
2021-04-25Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJeanette Thomas / Jeffrey Bayless vs William Hertford / Janet Cathcart3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSara Crate / Walt Crate vs Hong Huynh / Richard Anderson6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Alan Peters vs Michelle Dombek / Eric Freeman6-2, 6-0
2021-04-16Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesBrooke Daniel / Joe Conyard vs Kelley Gaylor / Dean Gaylor0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeanette Thomas / Jeffrey Bayless vs Jacqueline Wilcox / Lee Wilcox6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSara Crate / Walt Crate vs Patti Dybdahl / Samuel Broda2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-04-10Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKayla Casebeer / Rudy Martinez vs Janet Lee / Derek Carlson6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrooke Daniel / Walt Crate vs Annette Hill / Stefano Cavallucci3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Jeffrey Bayless vs Lyndsey Matteson / Page Watts6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2021-04-03Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesBrooke Daniel / Joe Conyard vs Suzie Glenn / Bob Lehman7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Alan Peters vs Lana Lane / Scott Lane4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKayla Casebeer / Rudy Martinez vs Kaie Wellman / Allen VanLeuven7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-03-19Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesBrooke Daniel / Joe Conyard vs Kathleen Budnick / Paul Best6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Zachary Wright vs Kristi Vargas / Paul Preston6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKristin Eckelman / Matthew Casimo vs Julia Rea / Paul Kachel6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Joe Conyard
52W–50L career
not enough data
—
4
Jeanette Thomas
89W–74L career
40%60%0%
3.48
3.5
Sara Crate
92W–86L career
0%88%12%
3.47
3.5
Jeffrey Bayless
130W–100L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
Brooke Daniel
66W–48L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Kayla Casebeer
93W–63L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Melissa Gibson
31W–30L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Rudy Martinez
45W–105L career
3%97%0%
3.18
3.5
Zachary Wright
177W–142L career
3%97%0%
3.17
3.5
Catherine Leedy
86W–119L career
23%77%0%
3.04
3
Matthew Casimo
40W–103L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
Alan Peters
2W–21L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.