Teams

Weaver 40+ CCL

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 40 & OVER · WOMEN 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-06vs King/Reeves 40 & overWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Sweyer / Seanna Morgan vs Jennifer Blanchard / Shanna Bradshaw6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAmy Gibbons vs Connie West6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAlison Boswell / Pamela Bourgeois vs Donna Sloan / Lisa Hepler6-0, 6-2
2025-03-20vs Wagner/FernerWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnn Weaver / Amy Sweyer vs Mariska Truesdale / Becky Benson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlison Boswell / Pamela Bourgeois vs Libbie Schaffer / Kimberly Hutchins6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Beacham / Sommer Grant vs Stephanie Wagner / Sandra Cerra6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Seanna Morgan
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Pamela Bourgeois
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Amy Sweyer
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.92
Hannah Bodemann
published 3
2.87
Shannon Stephens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Alison Boswell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Andrea Crumpton
published 3
2.84
Sommer Grant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Rhonda Sweeney
published
Allison McWhorter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Elizabeth Beacham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Amy Gibbons
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Kate Baynard
published
Pamela Dieffenbauch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Sweyer + Shannon Stephens134 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Bourgeois + Alison Boswell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Seanna Morgan
5W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.08
Pamela Bourgeois
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%55%<1%
3.02
3
Amy Sweyer
24W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Hannah Bodemann
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Shannon Stephens
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Alison Boswell
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Andrea Crumpton
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.87
Sommer Grant
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
Rhonda Sweeney
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Allison McWhorter
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Beacham
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Amy Gibbons
8W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Kate Baynard
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Clark-Bradley
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Dieffenbauch
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.