← Teams

SAC-Gebhardt/Wheeler

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Craig Frasier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Jeff Wheeler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Charles Gebhardt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
John Bergin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Donny Cablao
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Jeff Gonzales
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Daniel Rousseau
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.51
Dave Sato
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-05-07Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesCraig Frasier / Robin Olson vs Michael Mitchell / Mark Rothert6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCharles Gebhardt / Jeff Gonzales vs Randy Boose / Vilath Oudomphong6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJohn Bergin / Dave Sato vs Gary Chin / Mike Weedall6-2, 6-0
2024-05-02Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJeff Wheeler / Robin Olson vs Roger North / John Popplewell7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDonny Cablao / John Bergin vs Randy Boose / Vilath Oudomphong6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Hummel / Daniel Rousseau vs Steven Boeh / Jim Gerber6-3, 6-4
2024-04-16Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesCraig Frasier / Robin Olson vs Mister Archedon / Alan Jones6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJohn Hummel / Jeff Wheeler vs Steve Russell / Clay Funkhouser6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCharles Gebhardt / John Bergin vs David Shook / Jon Mandeville6-3, 7-6
2024-04-11Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesCraig Frasier / Robin Olson vs Dan Wendling / Mike Baker6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJeff Wheeler / John Hummel vs John Major / Scott Havens7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDonny Cablao / Jeff Gonzales vs Les Wellman / Terry Casebeer6-3, 6-3
2024-04-04Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesCraig Frasier / John Hummel vs Mark Mitchell / Jeffrey Bayless6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJeff Wheeler / Jeff Gonzales vs Chip Burczak / Tony Humpage6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCharles Gebhardt / Dave Sato vs Dean Dordevic / Matthew Casimo6-2, 6-3
2024-03-28Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesCraig Frasier / Jeff Wheeler vs John Wallin / Rolf Ellingsen7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDaniel Rousseau / Donny Cablao vs Hayward Reed / Bruce Yang6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCharles Gebhardt / Dave Sato vs Kimbal Logan / Douglas Walker6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-03-21Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesCraig Frasier / Jeff Wheeler vs Jim DeWeese / James Stenger7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCharles Gebhardt / John Hummel vs Dan Wolff / Dale Vandenburgh3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Rousseau / Dave Sato vs Robert Cohns / Steven Garlock2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-14Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesCraig Frasier / David Williams vs James Horen / Steven Grant6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCharles Gebhardt / John Hummel vs Mark Becker / Makoto Sakaguchi7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJohn Bergin / Daniel Rousseau vs Randall Sinn / Thomas Mehlhorn6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Craig Frasier
108W–75L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Jeff Wheeler
30W–51L career
4%96%1%
3.22
3.5
Charles Gebhardt
12W–25L career
14%83%2%
3.18
3.5
John Bergin
16W–27L career
17%82%1%
3.13
3
Donny Cablao
42W–50L career
0%85%15%
2.92
3
Jeff Gonzales
19W–58L career
0%98%2%
2.83
3
Daniel Rousseau
4W–12L career
8%87%5%
2.75
3
Dave Sato
40W–110L career
31%69%0%
2.51

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.