Teams

Sa.Fitzpatrick18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-13vs Cl.Duff18ALost 02
L#1 DoublesAlice Touchette / Cara Garrett vs Laura Roach / Caroline Smith1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJayme Hobgood / Monika Garrell vs Margaret Ann Kleisch / Katie Clayton2-6, 1-6
2024-05-06vs Am.Potratz18AWon 10
W#2 DoublesCameron Jones / Monika Garrell vs Elizabeth Jenkins / Ellen Shook6-0, 6-0
2024-04-22Won 10
W#1 SinglesBeth Pegram vs Deanna MacCormac6-0, 6-1
2024-04-15Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAlice Touchette vs Lauren Gray5-7, 4-6
2024-04-08vs Au.Beam18ALost 01
L#2 DoublesMonika Garrell / Jayme Hobgood vs Sarah Forman / Molly Lewis1-6, 2-6
2024-04-01vs La.Hampton18AWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeth Pegram / Alice Touchette vs Lauren Hampton / Jana Inman6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMonika Garrell / Cara Garrett vs Susan Gentry / Kari Marotta6-3, 6-1
2024-03-11vs Ke.Hurter18AWon 20
W#1 SinglesAlice Touchette vs Brandy Vannoy6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMonika Garrell / Sarah Herring vs Anne Enberg / Debi Booker6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Beth Pegram
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.97
Sarah Herring
published
2.69
Alice Touchette
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Sara Fitzpatrick
published
2.54
Cara Garrett
published 3
2.51
Shannon Vinson
published
2.32
Monika Garrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Laurie Yopp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Pegram + Alice Touchette6161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Beth Pegram
77W–59L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
Sarah Herring
16W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Alice Touchette
55W–50L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
Sara Fitzpatrick
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Cara Garrett
6W–14L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
2.54
Shannon Vinson
4W–14L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
2.51
2.5
Monika Garrell
42W–50L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%91%9%
2.32
Laurie Yopp
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.