Teams

TU - Collins

2025 Tuscaloosa USTA Adult Spring-Weeknight 18&over · 4.0 Adult Men-Weeknight

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-08vs Taylor-TTC 18+ 4.0 Spring 2025Won 31
W#1 DoublesJim Watkins / Christopher Gainer vs Maximilian Hammond / Matthew Hammond6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAndrew Osucha vs Douglas Klutz3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBlake van Atta / Rick Thomason vs Steve Buchheit / James Taylor6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTanner Summerlin / Eric Booth vs Hudson Hatfield / Andy Burns6-1, 6-2
2025-04-01vs Taylor-TTC 18+ 4.0 Spring 2025Split 22
W#1 DoublesRick Thomason / Tyler Cohen vs Maximilian Hammond / Matthew Hammond6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesTanner Summerlin vs Andy Burns6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTeddy Champion / Jim Watkins vs Douglas Klutz / Alex Barber6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJason Collins / Christopher Gainer vs Russell Johnson / Steve Buchheit6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-03-25vs Taylor-TTC 18+ 4.0 Spring 2025Won 40
W#1 DoublesBlake van Atta / Andrew Osucha vs Russell Johnson / Jonathan Wingo7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJohn Wilhite vs Douglas Klutz6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJason Collins / Todd DeZoort vs Maximilian Hammond / Steve Buchheit6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMike Price / Tyler Cohen vs Axl Buchheit / Hudson Hatfield6-1, 6-1
2025-03-18vs Taylor-TTC 18+ 4.0 Spring 2025Won 40
W#1 DoublesBlake van Atta / Teddy Champion vs Douglas Klutz / Alex Barber6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRick Thomason vs Maximilian Hammond6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEric Booth / Todd DeZoort vs Axl Buchheit / Jonathan Wingo6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJason Collins / Clint Mountain vs Steve Buchheit / Matthew Hammond7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-03-11vs Taylor-TTC 18+ 4.0 Spring 2025Won 40
W#1 DoublesJohn Wilhite / Clint Mountain vs Douglas Klutz / Maximilian Hammond5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEric Booth vs James Taylor6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJason Collins / Tyler Cohen vs Russell Johnson / Matthew Hammond6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRick Thomason / Mike Price vs Cristian Mendez / Andy Burns6-2, 6-2
2025-02-25vs Taylor-TTC 18+ 4.0 Spring 2025Won 31
L#1 DoublesTodd DeZoort / Tanner Summerlin vs Douglas Klutz / Alex Barber3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTeddy Champion vs James Taylor6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJason Collins / Eric Booth vs Maximilian Hammond / Steve Buchheit6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTyler Cohen / Andrew Osucha vs Cristian Mendez / Hudson Hatfield6-3, 7-5
2025-02-18vs Taylor-TTC 18+ 4.0 Spring 2025Won 31
W#1 DoublesTanner Summerlin / Eric Booth vs Axl Buchheit / Maximilian Hammond6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBlake van Atta vs Douglas Klutz6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Wilhite / Clint Mountain vs Alex Barber / Jonathan Wingo4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRick Thomason / Mike Price vs Russell Johnson / Andy Burns6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult Men-Weeknight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Christopher Gainer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Charles Breland
published 4
Clint Mountain
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Jim Watkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Blake van Atta
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.37
Eric Booth
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.33
Rick Thomason
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.32
Teddy Champion
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
John Wilhite
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Andrew Osucha
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.22
Tyler Cohen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Tanner Summerlin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Todd DeZoort
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Clint Mountain + John Wilhite224 matchesnot enough data
Eric Booth + John Wilhite224 matchesnot enough data
Eric Booth + Blake van Atta213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Gainer
131W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Charles Breland
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Clint Mountain
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jim Watkins
26W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Blake van Atta
24W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Eric Booth
20W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Rick Thomason
32W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.33
Teddy Champion
25W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
John Wilhite
15W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
4
Andrew Osucha
10W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.26
Tyler Cohen
14W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Tanner Summerlin
21W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
Todd DeZoort
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.