Teams

SGV LLW Super Smash Babes-Hayes-Downey HS/ SA12

2026 Winter Team Singles · SGV - Women 3.0

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 SinglesPenny Zhang vs Katherine Tygart6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesVanessa Vanda vs Rosie Johnston6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesLisa Santana vs Pauline Mauro1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-03-07vs SGV Arcadia Apex-Li-Arcadia-SA3Won 21
W#1 SinglesPenny Zhang vs Malaya Ho1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLisa Santana vs Jenny Loi7-5, 6-2
L#3 SinglesVanessa Vanda vs Julia Arnold0-6, 2-6
2026-02-28vs SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA12Won 20
W#1 SinglesVanessa Vanda vs Ruyu Hua6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLisa Santana vs Teresa Magsaysay6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesPenny Zhang vs Tina Lu7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesVanessa Vanda vs Pauline Mauro6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesLisa Santana vs Katherine Tygart1-6, 1-6
2026-02-07vs SGV Arcadia Apex-Li-Arcadia-SA3Lost 12
W#1 SinglesVanessa Vanda vs Malaya Ho6-2, 7-6
L#2 SinglesLisa Santana vs Julia Arnold5-7, 3-6
L#3 SinglesCorinda Hayes vs Alena Ananyeva3-6, 3-6
2026-01-31vs SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA12Won 21
W#1 SinglesVanessa Vanda vs Christine Pedroza6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLisa Santana vs Lea Zhang7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesCorinda Hayes vs Lin Zhan1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesVanessa Vanda vs Linda Lopez6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesCorinda Hayes vs Pauline Mauro0-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesLisa Santana vs Debra Sudo6-3, 7-5
2026-01-17vs SGV Arcadia Apex-Li-Arcadia-SA3Won 30
W#1 SinglesVanessa Vanda vs Malaya Ho0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesPenny Zhang vs Sydney Angrand6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesLisa Santana vs DARCELIA WILSON6-3, 1-1
2026-01-10vs SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA12Won 30
W#1 SinglesVanessa Vanda vs Teresa Magsaysay6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesPenny Zhang vs Wanyun Zhu7-6, 6-0
W#3 SinglesLisa Santana vs Christine Pedroza6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · SGV - Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SGV LLW Super Smash Babes-Hayes-Downey HS/ SA128121616202
2SGV Arcadia Apex-Li-Arcadia-SA354131428207
3SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA1236111635258
4SGV Spin Doctors-Lee-Flint CYN-SU122791840262

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Penny Zhang
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published
2.89
Vanessa Vanda
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
2.72
Lisa Santana
usually #3 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 44% · published
2.47
Corinda Hayes
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Penny Zhang
51W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.15
Vanessa Vanda
19W–10L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Lisa Santana
16W–16L career · 9 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Corinda Hayes
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.