Teams

HH55/Holland/Spring Lake Set2Win

Combo 55 & Over · 55+ 6.5 Combo Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 55+ 6.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Iris Petrillo
published 3.5
3.40
Maureen Riley
published
3.40
Lisa Sisko
published
3.28
Teresa Hamel
published
Carrie Peterson
published 3.5
3.24
Gretchen Griggs
published 3.5
3.17
Patty Zensinger
published
3.07
Mary Howe
published
2.99
Alene Deloach
published 3.5
2.93
Laureen Yingling
published
2.93
Joyce Hollis
published
2.88
Sue Lievense
published
Lesley Kenny
published
Susan Blake
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Iris Petrillo + Carrie Peterson3254% gamesnot enough data
Patty Zensinger + Maureen Riley314 matchesnot enough data
Iris Petrillo + Alene Deloach224 matchesnot enough data
Laureen Yingling + Gretchen Griggs404 matchesnot enough data
Joyce Hollis + Lesley Kenny033 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Hamel + Alene Deloach303 matchesnot enough data
Mary Howe + Gretchen Griggs123 matchesnot enough data
Gretchen Griggs + Susan Blake033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Iris Petrillo
54W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
Maureen Riley
50W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
Lisa Sisko
63W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Teresa Hamel
39W–40L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Carrie Peterson
37W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Gretchen Griggs
61W–25L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Patty Zensinger
28W–31L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
Mary Howe
24W–38L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Alene Deloach
37W–79L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.99
Laureen Yingling
48W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
Joyce Hollis
5W–20L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
2.93
Sue Lievense
19W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
Lesley Kenny
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Blake
12W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.