Teams

Cerrillo Mixed 7.0

Mixed 18 & Over · Mixed 7.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-03Won 30
W#1 DoublesClaudette Soto / Jose Villalobos vs Dennis Lemley / Kimberly Rangel6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTania Ramirez / Grey Valdez vs Rafael Arzapala / Nancy Martinez6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesOj Cerrillo / Celina Rodriguez vs Erika Noyola / Jason Guel6-2, 6-1
2026-08-02Won 20
W#1 DoublesJose Villalobos / Claudette Soto vs Paloma Guel / Ricardo Trevino6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBreanna Banda / Diego Benavides vs Dennis Lemley / Erika Noyola6-3, 6-2
2026-08-02Won 20
W#1 DoublesOj Cerrillo / Claudette Soto vs Paloma Guel / Jason Guel6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBreanna Banda / Diego Benavides vs Dennis Lemley / Kimberly Rangel7-5, 6-2
2026-08-01Won 30
W#1 DoublesGrey Valdez / Tania Ramirez vs Nancy Martinez / Jason Guel6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBreanna Banda / Diego Benavides vs Dennis Lemley / Paloma Guel6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCelina Rodriguez / Jose Villalobos vs Erika Noyola / Rafael Arzapala6-4, 6-1
2026-08-01Won 20
W#1 DoublesTania Ramirez / Grey Valdez vs Kimberly Rangel / Ricardo Trevino6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCelina Rodriguez / Oj Cerrillo vs Jason Guel / Erika Noyola6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Mixed 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cerrillo Mixed 7.050150053
2Guel Mixed 7.00501530181

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Breanna Banda
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.79
Tania Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Claudette Soto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.79
Diego Benavides
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Grey Valdez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jose Villalobos
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Oj Cerrillo
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tania Ramirez + Grey Valdez303 matchesnot enough data
Breanna Banda + Diego Benavides303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Breanna Banda
3W–0L career · type D · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
4.25
Tania Ramirez
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
3.5
Claudette Soto
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
3
Diego Benavides
3W–0L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Grey Valdez
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jose Villalobos
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Oj Cerrillo
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.