Teams

TOC.Tang

2025 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 7.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-13vs TOC.GregsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesDipen Vyas / Michael Muller vs Christopher Frederick / Eric Schraibman1-6, 0-6
2025-09-28vs TING.ByrdLost 01
L#2 DoublesNick Byrne / Nick Zelano vs Alex Boggis / Devohn Vines3-6, 0-6
2025-09-13vs TOC.MerckLost 02
L#1 DoublesDipen Vyas / Michael Muller vs Victor Talbird / Paul Narula2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesNick Zelano / Bert Clancey vs Kristofer Merck / Jeffrey Hungarter4-6, 1-6
2025-09-06vs TOC.JiWon 10
W#3 DoublesNick Zelano / Michael Muller vs Miles Feng / John Kim2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-23vs TING.Byrd2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNick Zelano / Marcus Lofton vs Vinicio Haro / Srivatsan Ramesh2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAniruddha Mayadeo / Dipen Vyas vs Deraymes Harris / Mike Meske1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Nick Zelano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.46
Dipen Vyas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.31
Nick Byrne
published
Aniruddha Mayadeo
published 3.5
3.12
Chien-Ting Tang
published 3.5
3.09
Bert Clancey
published 3.5
3.05
Jagan Puttoju
published
3.04
Stephen Fu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.59
Alex Bryan
published 3
2.55
Sam Basden
published 3
Karthik Palakode
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nick Zelano
55W–72L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Dipen Vyas
42W–140L career · 3 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
Nick Byrne
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Aniruddha Mayadeo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Chien-Ting Tang
1W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Bert Clancey
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Jagan Puttoju
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
3.5
Stephen Fu
75W–129L career · 2 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Alex Bryan
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Sam Basden
6W–31L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Karthik Palakode
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.