Teams

ELW Uselis

2023 Pinellas Adult 55 & Over Weekend Winter · 7.0 W Saturday

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-03-11vs ELW FriesWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Bandes / Amy Burns vs Martha Cornatzer / Stacey Castellini4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-04Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Bandes / Amy Burns vs Tracey Sullivan / Lisa Daly7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-02-11vs Innisbrook MahlerWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Bandes / Amy Burns vs Lori Heffner / Suteera Chaisumrej Joyce6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSandra Delosh / Karin Hartenbach vs Lisa Lowe / Kathy Pisciotta6-2, 6-3
2023-01-07Lost 01
L#3 DoublesHelen Rothberg / Mary Bandes vs Lisa Daly / Debra Decker3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Mary Bandes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.22
Amy Burns
published 3.5
3.18
Karin Hartenbach
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Cindi Crockett
published 3.5
Leslie McMahon
published
Teresa Orr
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Bandes
12W–9L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Amy Burns
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Karin Hartenbach
48W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Cindi Crockett
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
Leslie McMahon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Teresa Orr
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.