Teams

RVCC

Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 5.00 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-19vs PipkinWon 30
W#1 DoublesNicole Tullo / Lauren Jo Shipley vs Stephanie Drake / Numneung Koedkietpong7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKarin Weiner vs Cassidy Cruz6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJasmine Nichole Shaw-Morris / Sudha Lavu vs Madison Pipkin / Priya Narahari7-5, 6-4
2026-07-12vs Girl Pao-erLost 02
L#1 DoublesNarelle Krizek / Liz Wetherill vs Chloe Ouellet-Pizer / Ksenia Power2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTracy Rogers / Darcy Rabenda vs Meredith Lee / Samantha Nanere2-6, 1-6
2026-06-28vs A to ZWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarolina Bernal / Emma Clark vs Skye Victor / Stacey Weiner6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDarcy Rabenda vs Ying Lopez6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChanel Brown / Tracy Rogers vs Alyssa Burkhardt / Stefanie Dill1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-21vs PipkinWon 20
W#1 DoublesLiz Wetherill / Lauren Jo Shipley vs Stephanie Drake / Abigail Caddick6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSudha Lavu / Darcy Rabenda vs Aisha Bhimla / Priya Narahari6-0, 6-1
2026-06-14vs Girl Pao-erLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmma Clark / Liz Wetherill vs Mo Bertsch / Nataliya Bredikhina4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesNicole Tullo vs Ksenia Power2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJasmine Nichole Shaw-Morris / Rocio Fernandez de Camilo vs Madeline de Faber-Schumacher / Sasha Radulski6-4, 6-4
2026-06-07vs A to ZWon 30
W#1 DoublesLiz Wetherill / Nicole Tullo vs Carol Greenberg / Katherine Hederick6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNarelle Krizek vs Ying Lopez6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChanel Brown / Tracy Rogers vs Alyssa Burkhardt / Lee Leary6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 5.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Girl Pao-er061449106
2RVCC0612613134
3Pipkin069922183
4A to Z0611735213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.49 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.82
Darcy Rabenda
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
Carolina Bernal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.75
Rocio Fernandez de Camilo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.68
Nicole Tullo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.67
Liz Wetherill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.65
Chanel Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.65
Jasmine Nichole Shaw-Morris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.49
Karin Weiner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.34
Lauren Jo Shipley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Tracy Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Emma Clark
published
Narelle Krizek
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sudha Lavu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Rogers + Chanel Brown1639% games−5.3% vs expected
Jasmine Nichole Shaw-Morris + Chanel Brown224 matchesnot enough data
Carolina Bernal + Narelle Krizek134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Darcy Rabenda
6W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.82
5
Carolina Bernal
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rocio Fernandez de Camilo
36W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.75
Nicole Tullo
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.68
Liz Wetherill
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.67
5
Chanel Brown
22W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.65
Jasmine Nichole Shaw-Morris
24W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.65
Karin Weiner
56W–56L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.49
Lauren Jo Shipley
39W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.34
Tracy Rogers
8W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
3.38
Emma Clark
14W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Narelle Krizek
41W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sudha Lavu
19W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.