Teams

TSemones (OPRC)

2022 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Mixed 7.0 - Mon PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.64 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-17vs KCronin/AFink (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDeborah Toomey / Carl Council vs Stephanie Rock / Jared Ingram2-6, 2-6
2022-07-11vs JMorse/KJones (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Irick / Charles Irick vs Austin Grabowski / Dana Holloman4-6, 2-6
2022-06-27vs JDichak/VKoskinas (Weddington)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTraci Semones / John Semones vs Dawn Castain / Mike Gentile3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Irick / Charles Irick vs Kristin Kapur / Tano Failla5-7, 3-6
2022-06-20vs CMiles (Queens)Split 11
W#1 DoublesTraci Semones / John Semones vs Rafael Balderrama / Christine Miles6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLaura Irick / Charles Irick vs Benjamin Lescot / Brenda Jandebeur4-6, 3-6
2022-06-06vs TRamsay (Life Time)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesLaura Irick / Charles Irick vs Kim Wojnowich / Cameron Jones1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Toomey / Carl Council vs Tammy Ramsay / Martin Palmeri1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 7.0 - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
3.86
Traci Semones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
John Semones
published 4
3.62
Sara Lineberger
published
3.44
Laura Irick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Deborah Toomey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Sandra Troni
published
3.13
Andrew McWilliams
published 3.5
2.91
Carl Council
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina McWilliams + Andrew McWilliams3444% games−4.3% vs expected
Traci Semones + John Semones6750% games−10.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina McWilliams
46W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Traci Semones
139W–57L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
John Semones
40W–29L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
Sara Lineberger
10W–12L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62
3.5
Laura Irick
41W–35L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Deborah Toomey
127W–65L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
Sandra Troni
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Andrew McWilliams
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Carl Council
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.