Teams

PioneerPark/Ramsingh

2026 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Night · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-10vs Veltri/WynnWon 30
W#1 DoublesRose Cortez / Cynthia Thomas vs Jennifer Wynn / Melissa Rayman6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNatasha Ramsingh vs Adriana Madrid6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShannon Wayte / Susan Ruffolo vs Glynda Pineres / Sara Zavaleta6-2, 6-1
2026-05-30vs Veltri/WynnWon 20
W#1 SinglesRose Cortez vs Sana Mithani4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShannon Wayte / Susan Ruffolo vs Sara Zavaleta / Dasha Donado6-2, 6-2
2026-05-28vs Midtown/PerezLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngela Portal / Natasha Ramsingh vs Maria Pia Escamilla / Claudia Low1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCatherine Belanchia vs Julieta Escudero2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShannon Wayte / Susan Ruffolo vs Maria Martinez / Adriana Perez1-6, 1-6
2026-05-21vs Winner/Wrc/MendozaWon 21
W#1 DoublesRose Cortez / Cynthia Thomas vs Cristina Caballero / Carol Bortolin6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCatherine Belanchia vs Yiwen Fan0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRubia Cirigliano / Bridget Cecil vs Mercedes Civantos Capella / Damaris Mendoza4-6, 4-6
2026-05-07vs Midtown/PerezLost 12
L#1 DoublesBridget Cecil / Laurice Fasullo vs Lorena Esclair / Maria Martinez2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAngela Portal vs Geraldina Bidegain6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNella Rosales / Rubia Cirigliano vs Yiannik Bennett / Maylin Cusco3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-06vs Midtown/PerezWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaurice Fasullo / Bridget Cecil vs Claudia Low / Yiannik Bennett4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAngela Portal vs Lorena Esclair6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNella Rosales / Rubia Cirigliano vs Polina Reisman / Pilar Granados4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-04-30vs Winner/Wrc/MendozaLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurice Fasullo / Bridget Cecil vs Yiwen Fan / Mercedes Civantos Capella4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCatherine Belanchia vs Faviana Vivas0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNella Rosales / Rubia Cirigliano vs Irina Kazantsev / Carol Bortolin3-6, 5-7
2026-04-23vs Veltri/WynnWon 20
W#1 DoublesNatasha Ramsingh / Angela Portal vs Adriana Madrid / Jennifer Wynn6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Ruffolo / Rubia Cirigliano vs Paola Arnau / Glynda Pineres6-0, 6-1
2026-04-09vs Winner/Wrc/MendozaWon 21
W#1 DoublesRose Cortez / Cynthia Thomas vs Linda Cheung / Nilda Toro6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNatasha Ramsingh vs Faviana Vivas1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Ruffolo / Shannon Wayte vs Damaris Mendoza / Susana Vargas7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Winner/Wrc/Mendoza6320715173
2PioneerPark/Ramsingh63151230233
3Midtown/Perez54151229220
4Veltri/Wynn1842348299

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.29
Catherine Belanchia
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.27
Cynthia Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Angela Portal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.19
Bridget Cecil
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.18
Natasha Ramsingh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.16
Rose Cortez
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.13
Rubia Cirigliano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.01
Susan Ruffolo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.96
Laurice Fasullo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.96
Shannon Wayte
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.95
Nella Rosales
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Thomas + Rose Cortez7353% games+8.6% vs expected
Susan Ruffolo + Shannon Wayte3747% games+3.2% vs expected
Bridget Cecil + Laurice Fasullo21041% games−1.6% vs expected
Nella Rosales + Rubia Cirigliano1442% games−5.3% vs expected
Catherine Belanchia + Natasha Ramsingh123 matchesnot enough data
Rose Cortez + Angela Portal303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Catherine Belanchia
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Cynthia Thomas
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Angela Portal
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Bridget Cecil
3W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Natasha Ramsingh
6W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Rose Cortez
13W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Rubia Cirigliano
4W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Susan Ruffolo
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Laurice Fasullo
2W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Shannon Wayte
3W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Nella Rosales
3W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.