Teams

LATA40-Taylor-SSP

2025 Adult 40 & Over - USTA · Adult Women - 3.5 - Day

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 3.5 - Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Stacy Lyons
published
3.65
Deidre Neuberg
published 3.5
3.34
Kristin Senn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
3.29
Chelsey Ruff
published 3.5
3.26
Carmen Goulet
published 3.5
3.22
Meghan Hock
published
3.21
Sara Marrello
published
3.21
Stefanie Carpenter
published
3.20
Jackie Belcher-Cook
published
3.15
Monica Hurley
published
3.05
Heather Chittam
published
3.00
Julie Ricken
published
2.99
Lorri Cold
published
2.94
Janet Buhrow
published
Elizabeth O'Rourke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Laura Kane
published
Linsey Driskill
published
Rebecca Coleman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Coleman + Laura Kane301060% games+3.1% vs expected
Janet Buhrow + Julie Ricken1448% games−9.2% vs expected
Jackie Belcher-Cook + Carmen Goulet1539% gamesnot enough data
Janet Buhrow + Kristin Senn224 matchesnot enough data
Janet Buhrow + Carmen Goulet213 matchesnot enough data
Julie Ricken + Lorri Cold213 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Senn + Lorri Cold123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacy Lyons
148W–29L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.93
3.5
Deidre Neuberg
86W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.65
Kristin Senn
55W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Tracy Pearson-Graves
75W–70L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Chelsey Ruff
29W–22L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Carmen Goulet
93W–92L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Meghan Hock
44W–31L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Sara Marrello
51W–53L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Stefanie Carpenter
10W–16L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Jackie Belcher-Cook
69W–77L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Monica Hurley
49W–68L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.15
Heather Chittam
9W–16L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
Julie Ricken
16W–31L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Lorri Cold
23W–44L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Janet Buhrow
51W–67L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
Elizabeth O'Rourke
42W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Kane
99W–44L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linsey Driskill
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Coleman
74W–43L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.