Teams

CSCC DAVIS

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-01vs BRDMR EASTMANLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Gateley / Peggy Kimsey vs Annette Eastman / Paula Lipes1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKristi McCann vs Christie Lee7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDiane Wilborn / Lisa Smith vs Krista Heinicke / Patricia Temple4-6, 4-6
2025-08-11vs CCOC KNORRLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristi McCann / Jacqueline Skaggs vs Nina Ballenger / Anne Janda3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDiane Wilborn vs Jillian Ringer2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Gateley / Peggy Kimsey vs Cody Ross / Kelly Sung3-6, 0-6
2025-08-04vs MEMPK CAMPBELLSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulie Davis / Trudi Jackson vs Jamie Horspool / Jennifer Tanner6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesColleen Miller / Jacqueline Skaggs vs Tricia Campbell / Andrea Murray0-6, 0-6
2025-07-28vs BRDMR EASTMANLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristi McCann / Colleen Miller vs Paula Lipes / Krista Heinicke3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMelissa Gateley vs Lorna Gutierrez7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPeggy Kimsey / Patrice Tafolla vs Annette Eastman / Jasmine Pahk7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Melissa Gateley
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.87
Trudi Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Kristi McCann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.51
Jacqueline Skaggs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.33
Diane Wilborn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Patrice Tafolla
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Peggy Kimsey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Gateley
29W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Trudi Jackson
15W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87
Kristi McCann
10W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Jacqueline Skaggs
6W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
3
Diane Wilborn
4W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.33
Patrice Tafolla
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Peggy Kimsey
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.