Teams

LCTA39/Eiland-Browning/Creekside

LCTA 39 & Over Fall League · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.0 Sunday

12 players · average NTRP 2.90 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings10 teams · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.0 Sunday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Net Results000000
2LCTA39/Donohue/MPR000000
3Krewson/Petzold000000
4Sunday Funday000000
5LCTA39/Ballard/000000
6LCTA39/Hildreth-Marlowe/SneeFarm000000
7Wright/Hamlin000000
8LCTA39-PW-WojicK-NEE000000
9LCTA39/Villarose/Pine Forest000000
10LCTA39/Eiland-Browning/Creekside000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Georgia Nettles
published 3
Caroline Rivera
published 3
2.72
Stephanie Whitener
published
2.69
Ann Schwartz
published 3
2.68
Laura Tharp
published
2.62
Jessica Browning
published
2.48
Theresa Cossel
published
2.40
Tricia Yount
published
2.32
Alexis Eiland
published 3
2.12
Erica Chapin
published 2.5
2.06
Kathleen Domm
published
Lauren Player
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Tharp + Georgia Nettles224 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Domm + Erica Chapin134 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Yount + Caroline Rivera123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Georgia Nettles
9W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Caroline Rivera
3W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Whitener
6W–16L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Ann Schwartz
14W–37L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Laura Tharp
31W–24L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
Jessica Browning
7W–19L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.62
Theresa Cossel
10W–12L career · no lines in 2026
0%56%44%
2.48
Tricia Yount
9W–18L career · no lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.40
3
Alexis Eiland
15W–22L career · no lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.32
2.5
Erica Chapin
17W–44L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Kathleen Domm
3W–25L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Lauren Player
7W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.