Teams

GEPTA/18&overMX/6.0/Gabilondo/EPTC#3

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 2.83 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Ana Gabilondo
usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.86
Diana Cardiel
usually #3 Doubles 31%, also #1 Singles 31% · published 3
2.35
Brianda Van
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Elsie Villarreal
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Humberto Cardiel
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
JOSE MENDEZ
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Jorge Contreras
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Luis Carlos Garcia
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Luisa Franco
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Maria Julieta Hall-Ochoa
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Michelle Bordier
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Paola Rojas Miranda
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
Rafael Gabilondo
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Roberto Ochoa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sophia De La Parra
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Bordier + Luisa Franco15560% gamesnot enough data
Diana Cardiel + Humberto Cardiel4159% gamesnot enough data
Maria Julieta Hall-Ochoa + Elsie Villarreal134 matchesnot enough data
Elsie Villarreal + JOSE MENDEZ134 matchesnot enough data
JOSE MENDEZ + Luisa Franco303 matchesnot enough data
Humberto Cardiel + Paola Rojas Miranda213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ana Gabilondo
28W–28L career · 17 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Diana Cardiel
36W–56L career · 27 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
2.5
Brianda Van
21W–27L career · 16 lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
Elsie Villarreal
57W–39L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Humberto Cardiel
51W–62L career · 29 lines in 2025
not enough data
JOSE MENDEZ
33W–43L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jorge Contreras
7W–5L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luis Carlos Garcia
10W–12L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca
45W–31L career · 36 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luisa Franco
27W–12L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria Julieta Hall-Ochoa
67W–64L career · 31 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Bordier
29W–10L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paola Rojas Miranda
16W–28L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rafael Gabilondo
8W–15L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Roberto Ochoa
5W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sophia De La Parra
12W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.