Teams

CSRC MCCLENDON

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-03vs CCOC BAILEYWon 10
W#3 DoublesLou Ann McClendon / Cindy Hoit vs Mary Simmons / Febra Pope1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-27vs LTFCS WISNERLost 01
L#3 DoublesLou Ann McClendon / Cindy Hoit vs Karen Walton / Barbara Hanley2-6, 2-6
2021-05-20vs CCW GANNLost 02
L#2 DoublesLou Ann McClendon / Cindy Hoit vs Kele Hauke / Kathy Rex2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMyra Cobb / Alice Ratcliffe vs Sharon Gann / Tracy Slater4-6, 3-6
2021-05-13vs MEMPK STEWARTLost 01
L#3 DoublesCindy Hoit / Robbie Conway vs Lisa Bigelow / Elizabeth Price2-6, 3-6
2021-04-29Lost 02
L#2 DoublesAlice Ratcliffe / Myra Cobb vs Elizabeth Morgan / Dawn Conley4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLou Ann McClendon / Cindy Hoit vs Mary Vanryzin / Susan Hunt3-6, 2-6
2021-04-22vs LTFCS WISNERWon 10
W#3 DoublesMyra Cobb / Alice Ratcliffe vs Linda Acee / Jane Wisner7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Shelby Johnson
published
3.54
Theresa Watson
published
DARLENE WARMOUTH
published 3.5
3.04
Lou Ann McClendon
published
2.90
Alice Ratcliffe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Robbie Conway
published
2.77
Cindy Hoit
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Jenni Ehrlin
published
Kathleen White
published
Myra Cobb
published
WENDY WESTON
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenni Ehrlin + Theresa Watson4258% games−3.5% vs expected
Robbie Conway + Cindy Hoit314 matchesnot enough data
Myra Cobb + Robbie Conway033 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen White + DARLENE WARMOUTH123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shelby Johnson
37W–27L career · no lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
3.93
Theresa Watson
27W–30L career · no lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
DARLENE WARMOUTH
29W–32L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lou Ann McClendon
19W–34L career · no lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Alice Ratcliffe
60W–31L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
2.90
Robbie Conway
12W–27L career · no lines in 2021
93%7%<1%
2.80
3
Cindy Hoit
76W–82L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
Jenni Ehrlin
25W–18L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathleen White
7W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Myra Cobb
6W–25L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
WENDY WESTON
33W–22L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.