Teams

MCAC:M Waldron:MWaldron

2023 Cape Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed FLT 1

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#2 DoublesKyra Travis / Aaron Ridley vs Joyce Taber / Abdel Elmemeh6-3, 6-2
2023-05-19vs MCAC:Nunes-Brown:Nunes-BrownWon 10
W#2 DoublesKyra Travis / Aaron Ridley vs Kimberly Gazal Santos / Paul Napoli6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKyra Travis / Aaron Ridley vs Pele Santos / Jana Vojtasova5-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Mixed FLT 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCAC:Nunes-Brown:Nunes-Brown43101123189
2MCAC:M Waldron:MWaldron34111026198

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Kyra Travis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
3.89
Michelle Waldron
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Denise Wright
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
Desiree Mobed
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Heather Palmer
published 4
3.33
Lisa Swansey
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
Deanna Waldron
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Aaron Ridley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Leveille
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Tim ONeill
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aaron Ridley + Kyra Travis6259% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Waldron + Michael Leveille2444% gamesnot enough data
Desiree Mobed + Michael Leveille213 matchesnot enough data
Michael Leveille + Denise Wright213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyra Travis
84W–30L career · 14 lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
4.04
Michelle Waldron
41W–34L career · 18 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Denise Wright
30W–61L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Desiree Mobed
33W–28L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Heather Palmer
16W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Swansey
172W–132L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Deanna Waldron
37W–68L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Aaron Ridley
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Leveille
26W–21L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tim ONeill
33W–28L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.