Teams

WOCC Moehling Mix 7.0

2025 Richmond Mixed 40 & Over · Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-16vs ACAC- Davis Double Trouble MixSplit 11
L#1 DoublesShawn Harwood / Farrell Harwood vs Rebecca Cassilly / Thomas Wilson3-3
W#2 DoublesBernly Bressler / Laura Vetter vs Eric Carter / Carol Pfeiffer6-1, 6-3
2025-06-09vs Hermitage BlankleyLost 01
L#2 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Alex Burnett vs ANJA BAUGH / Jose Mendoza4-6, 5-7
2025-05-22vs TDC CarlyleWon 20
W#1 DoublesFarrell Harwood / Shawn Harwood vs Peter Walencis / Nathalie Stephens6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJenefer Williams / Jeff Moehling vs Timothy Hogan / Melissa MacAleese6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Darlene Moehling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Farrell Harwood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
James Rosenstock
published
3.42
Heather Drew
published
3.37
Laura Vetter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Roland Vetter
published
3.31
Scott Boyle
published
3.24
Jeff Moehling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Shawn Harwood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Bernly Bressler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Jenefer Williams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Alex Burnett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.97
Ivan Mullinax
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shawn Harwood + Farrell Harwood4354% games+13.0% vs expected
Laura Vetter + Roland Vetter404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darlene Moehling
110W–77L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Farrell Harwood
23W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
James Rosenstock
24W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Heather Drew
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Laura Vetter
20W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Roland Vetter
16W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Scott Boyle
18W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Jeff Moehling
15W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Shawn Harwood
12W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Bernly Bressler
14W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Jenefer Williams
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3
Alex Burnett
35W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
Ivan Mullinax
32W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.