Teams

Tonks/Ymca/foothills

2023 Foothills Combo Doubles - 55 & Over · 7.5 Combo Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-15vs Place/HCP/FoothillsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJeanne Ann Lewis / Rosemary Skoog vs Tracy Kiefer / Margie Henry5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Tonks / Tracy Nestor vs Susan Ottofaro Ray / Connie Kleeves2-6, 4-6
2023-10-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Tonks / Susan Knowles vs Marian Erikson / Sally Anderson6-7, 4-6
2023-10-01vs Place/HCP/FoothillsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Tonks / Tracy Nestor vs Marian Erikson / Sally Anderson5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJeanne Ann Lewis / Rosemary Skoog vs Margie Henry / Susan Ottofaro Ray6-1, 6-4
2023-09-24vs Place/HCP/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Church / Marsha Diamonti vs Marian Erikson / Courtney Haan0-6, 2-6
2023-09-17vs Place/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Tonks / Susan Knowles vs Margie Henry / Tracy Kiefer3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-09-10vs Place/HCP/FoothillsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Hartman / Marsha Diamonti vs Connie Kleeves / Michele Mcbride0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRosemary Skoog / Jeanne Ann Lewis vs Lynne Place / Carson Helsper6-4, 7-5
2023-08-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Tonks / Tracy Nestor vs Michele Mcbride / Sally Anderson6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Pam Muncy
published
3.78
Karen Tonks
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.67
Jeanne Ann Lewis
published
3.66
3.45
Kimberly Church
published
3.24
Marsha Diamonti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Rosemary Skoog
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Cori Thompson
published 3.5
3.07
Susan Knowles
published
Tracy Nestor
published
Valerie Craig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marsha Diamonti + Rosemary Skoog262251% games−1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pam Muncy
31W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Karen Tonks
123W–132L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Jeanne Ann Lewis
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Charlotte Hartman
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Kimberly Church
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Marsha Diamonti
246W–258L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Rosemary Skoog
214W–143L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Cori Thompson
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
3.08
Susan Knowles
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.07
Tracy Nestor
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Valerie Craig
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.