Teams

SD Rapid City

2026 USTA League Tennis SD v ND 40 · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-26vs ND BismarckWon 32
L#1 DoublesTiffany Cholez / Kristin Marsh vs Nicole Taylor / Lori Martin3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesLisa Katzenstein vs Melissa Morasch6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDawn Wattenhofer / Milidi Dickenson vs Mary Sayler / Erica Roth7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAnnie Bussler / Christiane Engman vs Jody Benz / Alison Krumm7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesTara Carlson / Janie Ewing vs Julie Bosch / Judi Swanberg4-6, 3-6
2026-04-25vs ND BismarckWon 32
W#1 DoublesLisa Katzenstein / Christiane Engman vs Lori Martin / Nicole Taylor7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTiffany Cholez vs Ronda Zupi6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKibbe Conti / Lori Hanson vs Melissa Morasch / Mary Sayler7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanie Ewing / Tara Carlson vs Erica Roth / Judi Swanberg0-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesKristin Marsh / BETH NELSON vs Alison Krumm / Julie Bosch1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-25vs ND BismarckLost 14
L#1 DoublesLisa Katzenstein / Dawn Wattenhofer vs Lori Martin / Nicole Taylor7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChristiane Engman vs Melissa Morasch1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLori Hanson / Tiffany Cholez vs Erica Roth / Jody Benz2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristin Marsh / Annie Bussler vs Mary Sayler / Ronda Zupi3-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesBETH NELSON / Tara Carlson vs Julie Bosch / Judi Swanberg4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD Rapid City217821170
2ND Bismarck128717130

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Lisa Katzenstein
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.14
Kibbe Conti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Tiffany Cholez
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.96
Milidi Dickenson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Dawn Wattenhofer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Christiane Engman
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Annie Bussler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Tara Carlson
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
BETH NELSON
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Kristin Marsh
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
2.59
Janie Ewing
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Carlson + Janie Ewing2739% games+4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Katzenstein
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
Kibbe Conti
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.14
Tiffany Cholez
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Milidi Dickenson
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Dawn Wattenhofer
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Christiane Engman
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Annie Bussler
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Tara Carlson
2W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
BETH NELSON
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
Kristin Marsh
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Janie Ewing
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.