Teams

St.Grose55C

2025 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-10-09vs Ap.Lyon55CWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Troch / Stacy Grose vs Jennifer Hall / Amy Ellis6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMelanie Waldron / Hope Pflaum vs Shirley Chapman / Sandy Willey6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Hepp / LaDonna Lee vs Kelly Johnson / Carolyn Elliott6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-07vs Be.Robertson55CLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Hepp / Dorothy Nance vs Dara Haney / Beth Robertson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Foster / Carrie Struble vs Anne Mueller / Susan Wilkerson3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Troch / Hope Pflaum vs Kelly Foglia / Barbra Wait7-5, 6-2
2025-09-23vs Ki.Lamb55CWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Hepp / Stacy Grose vs Holly Atkinson / Vanessa Manuel7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPeggy Williams / Linda Nuxoll vs Michele Storr / Mayra Rodriguez3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSheila Breckenridge / LaDonna Lee vs Mary Tulenko / Kelly Zargo6-4, 6-1
2025-09-16vs Pe.LeGaux55CLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Carroll / Hope Pflaum vs Kelleigh Russo / Laurene Fitzgerald6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-09-10vs Pe.LeGaux55CWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarrie Struble / Dorothy Nance vs Carolina Robayo / Sharon Fred6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJennifer Troch / Hope Pflaum vs Perry LeGaux / Cecilia Edgar6-0, 6-2
2025-09-09vs Je.Komes55C6.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCarrie Struble / Stacy Grose vs Alice Hicks / Stacey Stephens6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Troch / Hope Pflaum vs Joanne Kearney / Ange Urlaub4-6, 2-6
2025-09-02vs Be.Robertson55CWon 21
L#1 DoublesSheila Breckenridge / Melanie Waldron vs Dara Haney / Anne Mueller2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKaren Hepp / Heather Mills vs Kelli Williams / Barbra Wait7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Troch / Linda Nuxoll vs Michele Moore / Shannon Fuller6-4, 6-1
2025-08-27vs Je.Komes55C6.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Troch / Stacy Grose vs Cheryl Smyth / Lorrie Hareza6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Hepp / Dorothy Nance vs Rossi Evans / Joanne Kearney6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJill David / Linda Nuxoll vs Lan Bello / Jenny Komes1-6, 1-6
2025-08-26vs Ap.Lyon55CLost 02
L#1 DoublesStacy Grose / Jill David vs Kelly Johnson / Lee Berrios-Smothers2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarrie Struble / Hope Pflaum vs Cheryl Kata / Alisa Miller3-6, 3-6
2025-08-19vs Ki.Lamb55CWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelanie Waldron / Carrie Struble vs Tina Goertz / Stacie White6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKaren Hepp / Heather Mills vs Holly Atkinson / Kelly Zargo3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSheila Breckenridge / LaDonna Lee vs Jeanne Russell / Jennifer Tun6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Karen Hepp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Linda Carroll
published
3.20
Jennifer Troch
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Carrie Struble
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Jill David
published
3.10
Sheila Breckenridge
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Melanie Waldron
published
2.86
Dorothy Nance
published
2.81
Stacy Grose
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Linda Nuxoll
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Hope Pflaum
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.73
LaDonna Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Struble + Jennifer Troch5458% games+11.4% vs expected
Hope Pflaum + Stacy Grose10654% games+8.6% vs expected
Sheila Breckenridge + Karen Hepp9657% games+0.8% vs expected
Jennifer Troch + Hope Pflaum16855% games+0.7% vs expected
Jennifer Troch + Karen Hepp3254% games−2.5% vs expected
Carrie Struble + Hope Pflaum5552% games−7.5% vs expected
Jennifer Troch + Stacy Grose9657% gamesnot enough data
Carrie Struble + Stacy Grose4356% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Karen Hepp
174W–98L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Linda Carroll
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Jennifer Troch
155W–100L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Carrie Struble
119W–92L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Jill David
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Sheila Breckenridge
161W–94L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Melanie Waldron
15W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Dorothy Nance
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Stacy Grose
104W–74L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Linda Nuxoll
70W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Hope Pflaum
149W–101L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
LaDonna Lee
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.