Teams

Over Served

2026 18&over Women Day Winter · 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-04-02vs Centercourt ChathamWon 10
W#3 DoublesSharon Kahn / Anita Singh vs Leah Dunmore / Ritu Bahal7-5, 5-2
2026-03-19vs WarrenWon 31
W#1 DoublesStaci Acquasanta / Mandy Borys vs Janet Himstead / Esther Wendling6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesCindy Carracino vs Ipsita Sethy6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDaryl Caiola / Christina Maurillo vs Stacey Marotta / Manisha Degaonkar6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAnita Singh / June Zimmerman vs Lynne Ainge / Heather Finan2-6, 6-7
2026-03-12vs Shot GirlsLost 01
L#3 DoublesJeanne White / Sharon Kahn vs Maya Furumoto / Kazumi Otake1-6, 2-6
2026-03-05vs NJD: CrestmontSplit 22
L#1 DoublesStaci Acquasanta / Marisa Sobol vs Anu OBrien / Nicole Chalfoun4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCindy Carracino vs Iris Shih6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnne Marie Ramirez / Daryl Caiola vs Whitney Pojednic / Elizabeth Byrne Mullane2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesChristine Hogan / Mandy Borys vs Julie Wilska / Samantha Schmell6-2, 6-3
2026-02-26vs Centercourt Florham Park 1Won 10
W#3 DoublesChristine Hogan / Sharon Kahn vs Kimberly Smith / Catherine McMahon7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-19vs No Drama MamasWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnita Singh / Dara Eisenman vs Brianne Tuthill / Heather Meyers6-2, 6-3
2026-02-12vs WestfieldWon 10
W#2 DoublesDara Eisenman / Anita Singh vs Ellen Wolff / Jenny Madden7-5, 7-6
2026-02-05vs Murray HillWon 10
W#3 DoublesSharon Kahn / Anita Singh vs Jodi Burns / Jill Munson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-01-29vs Belles of the BallWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnne Marie Ramirez / Anita Singh vs Leslie Readlinger / Sarah Smith6-1, 7-6
2026-01-22vs FairfieldWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnita Singh / Sharon Kahn vs Pepper Paget / Holly Shaw6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Staci Acquasanta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Marisa Sobol
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Cindy Carracino
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Daryl Caiola
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Jill Markovits
published
Anne Marie Ramirez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Christina Maurillo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Christine Hogan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dara Eisenman
published 3.5
3.15
Anita Singh
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.04
Sharon Kahn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeanne White
published
June Zimmerman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mandy Borys
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Michelle Brindle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Staci Acquasanta + Marisa Sobol22760% games+8.8% vs expected
Anita Singh + Sharon Kahn10361% games+8.5% vs expected
Anne Marie Ramirez + Jill Markovits3351% games+5.4% vs expected
Anne Marie Ramirez + Cindy Carracino11853% games+2.0% vs expected
Christina Maurillo + Daryl Caiola15657% games+0.5% vs expected
June Zimmerman + Christina Maurillo4448% games+0.3% vs expected
Cindy Carracino + Jill Markovits5358% games+0.2% vs expected
Dara Eisenman + Daryl Caiola12463% games−1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Staci Acquasanta
34W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Marisa Sobol
30W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Cindy Carracino
100W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Daryl Caiola
62W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
Jill Markovits
93W–50L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Anne Marie Ramirez
64W–52L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Christina Maurillo
65W–47L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Christine Hogan
34W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Dara Eisenman
36W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Anita Singh
56W–34L career · 7 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
Sharon Kahn
48W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
Jeanne White
43W–31L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
June Zimmerman
14W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mandy Borys
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Brindle
14W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.