Teams

IH-COHEN

2026 MATA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring · 4.0 Women Day Friday

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-03vs RN-BloodworthWon 30
W#1 DoublesLou Holmes / Michelle Lisenby vs Tuti Hawkins / Peggy Trammell6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnna Barnes / Lisa West vs Teresa Moody / Patricia Meservey6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Sweenor / Holly Taylor vs Joanna Roller / Elizabeth Herndon6-2, 7-5
2026-03-30vs RN-BloodworthWon 40
W#1 DoublesChristine Epps / Jennifer Heller vs Lisa Wilcox / Sally Velasquez6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesShay Correa vs Windy Dehem1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarol Karlson / Anna Barnes vs Barb Bateman / Teresa Moody6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Sweenor / Meredith Covert vs Diane Bloodworth / Elizabeth Herndon6-1, 6-2
2026-03-25vs RN-BloodworthWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnna Barnes / Jennifer Heller vs Peggy Trammell / Joanna Roller6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesShay Correa vs Lisa Wilcox2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Epps / Joanna Jones vs Barb Bateman / Tuti Hawkins6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBecca McLeod / Jennifer Sweenor vs Tamara Banks / Patricia Meservey2-0
2026-03-13vs RN-BloodworthWon 31
W#1 DoublesBecca McLeod / Meredith Covert vs Carla Maples / Peggy Trammell6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBeth Cohen vs Joanna Roller6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarol Karlson / Jennifer Heller vs Lisa Wilcox / Sally Velasquez6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKimberly Faulkner / Miriam Smith vs Teresa Moody / Patricia Meservey6-2, 6-1
2026-03-13vs RN-BloodworthWon 31
W#1 DoublesLisa West / Lou Holmes vs Joanna Roller / Windy Dehem6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesBeth Cohen vs Lisa Wilcox3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnna Barnes / Jennifer Heller vs Diane Bloodworth / Starla Pellegrino6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBecca McLeod / Meredith Covert vs Peggy Trammell / Sally Velasquez6-4, 6-3
2026-03-06vs RN-BloodworthWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristine Epps / Carol Karlson vs Sally Velasquez / Joanna Roller4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJennifer Sweenor / Anna Barnes vs Carla Maples / Peggy Trammell6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichelle Lisenby / Miriam Smith vs Gretchen Sumner / Barb Bateman6-4, 6-2
2026-02-27vs RN-BloodworthWon 31
W#1 DoublesChristine Epps / Lou Holmes vs Windy Dehem / Sally Velasquez7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBeth Cohen vs Tuti Hawkins6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMeredith Covert / Michelle Lisenby vs Lisa Wilcox / Joanna Roller4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLisa West / Miriam Smith vs Starla Pellegrino / Teresa Moody7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Day Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Lou Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Christine Epps
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Lisa West
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Beth Cohen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.72
Becca McLeod
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Carol Karlson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Jennifer Sweenor
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.58
Michelle Lisenby
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.58
Miriam Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Kimberly Faulkner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Anna Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.46
Shay Correa
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.32
Meredith Covert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lou Holmes + Lisa West5075% gamesnot enough data
Carol Karlson + Beth Cohen224 matchesnot enough data
Lisa West + Miriam Smith404 matchesnot enough data
Meredith Covert + Becca McLeod404 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Faulkner + Miriam Smith303 matchesnot enough data
Lisa West + Beth Cohen303 matchesnot enough data
Meredith Covert + Miriam Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lou Holmes
8W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%34%
3.94
4
Christine Epps
26W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
Lisa West
29W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Beth Cohen
12W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Becca McLeod
23W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Carol Karlson
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Jennifer Sweenor
26W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Michelle Lisenby
13W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.58
Miriam Smith
16W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
Kimberly Faulkner
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Anna Barnes
14W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.46
Shay Correa
17W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.46
Meredith Covert
25W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.