Teams

Messier Roberson Day

2024 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 55 & OVER · WOMEN 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-27vs Kontoulas/Toomey (Day)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Martin / Phyllis Sheets vs Debra Carbone / Kathleen Murphy6-7, 6-7
2024-04-15vs Thomas/Travagliante (Day)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDiana Messier / Melissa Martin vs Lisa Williamson / Katie Monroe6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2024-04-06vs Sample/Jefferson 55Won 10
W#3 DoublesMelissa Martin / Sydney Werner vs Charlotte Yow / Lisa Weeks6-2, 6-0
2024-03-16vs Murray 55+Won 10
W#2 DoublesPhyllis Sheets / Melissa Martin vs Anne Murray / Barb Barry7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Pamela Tharrington
published
3.39
Phyllis Sheets
published
3.39
3.35
Melissa Martin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Diana Messier
published 3.5
Cynthia Spitzer
published 3.5
3.20
Sydney Werner
published
3.19
Maria Weese
published
Kathleen Kunze
published
Sharon Wesson
published
Sherri Souza
published
Suzy Horvath
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Messier + Kathleen Kunze134 matchesnot enough data
Diana Messier + Phyllis Sheets303 matchesnot enough data
Diana Messier + Maria Weese123 matchesnot enough data
Phyllis Sheets + Sherri Souza123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Tharrington
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.40
Phyllis Sheets
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
Margaret Varga-Roberson
8W–18L career · no lines in 2024
79%21%<1%
3.39
3.5
Melissa Martin
58W–52L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Diana Messier
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Cynthia Spitzer
6W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sydney Werner
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Maria Weese
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Kathleen Kunze
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sharon Wesson
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sherri Souza
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Suzy Horvath
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.