Teams

APT- UPR

Adult 18 &Over 2026 · 2026 18 & Over Women 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / PUERTO RICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-29vs IveLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaria Fernanda Leal / Gabriela Acevedo vs Valerie Garcia / Eileen Rodriguez4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesLeiah Arroyo vs Ana Casse6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesOderaiza Soto Jaume / Ruth Rivera vs Penelope Feliciano / Vanessa Beniquez6-4, 6-4
2026-06-28vs CTH-GiovanniLost 12
L#1 DoublesAntonia Adrover / Victoria Sauri vs Esther A Zelaya Flores / Natalia Serra5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Santiago vs Ana Castro6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRoxana Kiss / Idalis Gutierrez vs Ariana Landrau / Desiree Ortiz-Santiago6-2, 6-3
2026-06-27vs IveLost 13
L#1 DoublesRoxana Kiss / Gabriela Acevedo vs Damaris Vale / Eileen Rodriguez2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMaria Fernanda Leal vs Ana Leal1-6, 0-3
W#2 DoublesOderaiza Soto Jaume / Ruth Rivera vs Brenda Casse / Elisabeth Cusack6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAngie Troche-Huertas / Idalis Gutierrez vs Valerie Garcia / Enibeth Diaz6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-07vs IveWon 31
W#1 DoublesOderaiza Soto Jaume / Ruth Rivera vs Elisabeth Cusack / Damaris Vale6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMaria Fernanda Leal / Antonia Adrover vs Eileen Rodriguez / Carmen Jimenez1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLeiah Arroyo vs Vanessa Beniquez3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngie Troche-Huertas / Idalis Gutierrez vs Valerie Garcia / Enibeth Diaz7-6, 6-1
2026-06-06vs CTH-GiovanniLost 03
L#1 DoublesRoxana Kiss / Idalis Gutierrez vs Natalia Serra / Esther A Zelaya Flores6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJessica Latorre / Michelle Santiago vs Jinelis Marrero / Rashel Cano6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesOderaiza Soto Jaume / Gabriela Acevedo vs Amanda Suarez / Desiree Ortiz-Santiago2-6, 3-6
2026-05-31vs IveLost 05
L#1 DoublesOderaiza Soto Jaume / Jessica Latorre vs Elisabeth Cusack / Jennifer Garcia6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMaria Fernanda Leal vs Ana Leal0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRuth Rivera / Adriana Rosario vs Carmen Jimenez / Eileen Rodriguez2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLeiah Arroyo vs Ana Casse4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesIdalis Gutierrez / Michelle Santiago vs Penelope Feliciano / Vanessa Beniquez4-6, 3-6
2026-05-16vs CTH-GiovanniWon 31
W#1 DoublesRuth Rivera / Adriana Rosario vs KAMILA CORREA / Natalia Serra6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesIdalis Gutierrez / Roxana Kiss vs Nellisbeth Landrau / Amanda Suarez6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLeiah Arroyo vs Ariana Landrau6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAntonia Adrover / Jessica Latorre vs Jinelis Marrero / Rashel Cano2-6, 2-6
2026-05-03vs CTH-GiovanniWon 21
W#1 DoublesIdalis Gutierrez / Angie Troche-Huertas vs Jinelis Marrero / Rashel Cano5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVictoria Sauri / Maria Fernanda Leal vs Esther A Zelaya Flores / Natalia Serra4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAntonia Adrover / Ruth Rivera vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 18 & Over Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Leiah Arroyo
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.21
Ruth Rivera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
Roxana Kiss
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.16
Oderaiza Soto Jaume
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.14
Idalis Gutierrez
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
4.13
Michelle Santiago
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.10
Antonia Adrover
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.95
Maria Fernanda Leal
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.53
Gabriela Acevedo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roxana Kiss + Antonia Adrover3354% games+10.1% vs expected
Roxana Kiss + Ruth Rivera4453% games+4.5% vs expected
Oderaiza Soto Jaume + Ruth Rivera7356% games+3.0% vs expected
Roxana Kiss + Idalis Gutierrez314 matchesnot enough data
Ruth Rivera + Michelle Santiago123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leiah Arroyo
24W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Ruth Rivera
77W–44L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.21
Roxana Kiss
18W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
4.16
Oderaiza Soto Jaume
23W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
Idalis Gutierrez
8W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
4.14
Michelle Santiago
21W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
4.13
4.5
Antonia Adrover
115W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
4.10
Maria Fernanda Leal
0W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.95
Gabriela Acevedo
12W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.