Teams

HW GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 2.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-03vs CCV GREENLost 12
W#1 SinglesKrissie Marotto vs Mary Block6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCC Dick / Julie King vs Kristin Chapman / Liz Shepard0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesDebbie Haines vs Erin Miller2-6, 6-7
2022-05-30vs CACI GREENLost 23
L#1 DoublesKrissie Marotto / Kelly Kane vs Erin Broerman / Jean Coates2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesTraci Yuran vs Sarah Hughes3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Haines / Alicia Thorne vs Maria Orton / Vicki Goldman0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesSusan Wist vs Tammy Holder6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnne-Marie Hukriede / Lindsay Hogan vs Ellen Ribes-Smith / Kit Levoy4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-16vs SSLT NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLindsay Hogan / Mary Morris vs Rhea McMahon / Katherine Barnes1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnne-Marie Hukriede / Jennifer Kuptz vs Madison Irvine / Meghan Mariner6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCC Dick vs Michelle Brudigan4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDebbie Haines / Jamie Vonfeldt vs Jennifer Renard / Winddee Stallings3-6, 2-6
2022-05-09vs PRKR REDLost 23
L#1 DoublesCC Dick / Debbie Haines vs Lisa Lodge / Shannon Fronapfel2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSusan Wist vs Laura Hunter1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJamie Vonfeldt / Kelly Kane vs Lisa Mullins / Adrienne Brown6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKrissie Marotto vs Birgitte Sandgaard6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJulie King / Alicia Thorne vs Katherine Wilson / Wendy Eckert5-7, 6-7
2022-05-02vs PCC GOLDLost 14
L#1 DoublesKelly Kane / Alicia Thorne vs Kelly Bromeier / Roxanne Blair1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTraci Yuran vs Kelly Gavlak7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Morris / Jamie Vonfeldt vs Deborah Egan / Colleen Schwarz5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAnne-Marie Hukriede vs Shannon Lakes1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCC Dick / Susan Wist vs Karen Mazzini / Kimberly Schmidt6-0, 6-2
2022-04-25vs CPV REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesKelly Kane / Mary Morris vs Susan Boerema / JoAnn DelMonte2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKrissie Marotto vs Jill Skinner6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSusan Wist / Anne-Marie Hukriede vs Andrea Smart / Karen Lang3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLindsay Hogan vs Carrie Manion5-7, 4-4
L#3 DoublesDebbie Haines / Alicia Thorne vs Keely Sulya / Lisa Voss3-6, 1-6
2022-04-18vs PRC REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesMary Morris / Alicia Thorne vs Jennifer Meissner / Emily Carter1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJamie Vonfeldt / Susan Wist vs Sharon Kisch / Erika Pope3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKelly Kane vs Kelli Swan4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCC Dick / Jennifer Kuptz vs Amber Harris / Celeste Gardner3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Krissie Marotto
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.69
Lindsay Hogan
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.69
CC Dick
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.56
Mary Morris
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.48
Susan Wist
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.46
Anne-Marie Hukriede
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.40
Kelly Kane
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.35
Alicia Thorne
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.19
Jamie Vonfeldt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Debbie Haines
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Jennifer Kuptz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Traci Yuran
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne-Marie Hukriede + Mary Morris3350% games+8.9% vs expected
Alicia Thorne + Kelly Kane2446% games+4.3% vs expected
Kelly Kane + Krissie Marotto9457% games+3.4% vs expected
Jamie Vonfeldt + Mary Morris3639% games+0.3% vs expected
CC Dick + Krissie Marotto2342% games−0.3% vs expected
Mary Morris + Traci Yuran2345% games−0.6% vs expected
Susan Wist + Alicia Thorne2636% games−1.2% vs expected
Mary Morris + Lindsay Hogan1440% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Krissie Marotto
60W–52L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
Lindsay Hogan
10W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
CC Dick
83W–93L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.69
Mary Morris
25W–77L career · 4 lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
2.56
Susan Wist
23W–55L career · 5 lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
2.48
3
Anne-Marie Hukriede
18W–37L career · 4 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
2.46
Kelly Kane
24W–65L career · 5 lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
2.40
2.5
Alicia Thorne
18W–66L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%88%12%
2.35
2.5
Jamie Vonfeldt
16W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.19
Debbie Haines
0W–10L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Kuptz
9W–31L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Traci Yuran
9W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.