Teams

Refunded

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · Hold

9 players · average NTRP 3.43 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Hold have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Scott Arra
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Jane Williams
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.58
Susan Paeplow
published
3.43
Cybele Brockmann
published 4
3.39
Elissa Coughlin
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Emory Miller
published
2.86
Elena Ryzhikova
published 3
2.42
Cara Pierce
published 3
2.20
Craig Lynch
published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Scott Arra
35W–76L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Jane Williams
306W–299L career · 4 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Susan Paeplow
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Cybele Brockmann
82W–106L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Elissa Coughlin
40W–38L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.39
Emory Miller
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.10
3
Elena Ryzhikova
74W–61L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Cara Pierce
21W–50L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.42
2.5
Craig Lynch
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.