Teams

High Point/Jimenez W3.0S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesKavita Khandekar Chopra / Alyssa Tanis vs Rhonda Goodson / Jazzmin Ford-Evans6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNatalia Jimenez vs Lisa Wickhem6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKendra Aichele / Leslie Patterson vs Miriam Gomez / Amy Hite6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJennifer Craft vs Monica Susman6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Guthrie / Wanda Burrell vs Sarah Watson / Laura Sparkman2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-05-17vs DAC/Phillips-Shackelford W3.0SLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Craft / Julie Saqueton vs Sarah Cedillo / Sarah Roberts2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNatalia Jimenez vs Varina Lin6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Guthrie / Estela Zodrow vs Corinne Weis / Garland Askins2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-10vs Huffhines/Burns-Mulligan W3.0SSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMegan Mattingly / Alyssa Tanis vs Lauren Earhart-Macalanda / Kathrina Earhart-Macalanda6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNatalia Jimenez vs Sarah Southcott0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesWanda Burrell / Shannon Mahoney vs Mari Jo Mulligan / Merideth Mims0-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesEstela Zodrow / Kavita Khandekar Chopra vs Allison Shipley / Amy Vanderoef6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Amy Kelton
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.09
Alyssa Tanis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Jennifer Craft
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.00
Natalia Jimenez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.97
Jeanine Michna-Bales
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.89
Michelle Sowards
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
2.83
Estela Zodrow
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.71
Shannon Mahoney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Julie Saqueton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Wanda Burrell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.47
Kendra Aichele
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Alexis Scott-Boster
published 2.5
Jennifer Ridd
published
Kavita Khandekar Chopra
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Megan Mattingly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Guthrie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kavita Khandekar Chopra + Alyssa Tanis4259% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Sowards + Alyssa Tanis303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Kelton
22W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
3
Alyssa Tanis
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
Jennifer Craft
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Natalia Jimenez
15W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Jeanine Michna-Bales
9W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Michelle Sowards
30W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Estela Zodrow
18W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Shannon Mahoney
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.71
Julie Saqueton
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Wanda Burrell
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
Kendra Aichele
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.47
2.5
Alexis Scott-Boster
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Ridd
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kavita Khandekar Chopra
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Mattingly
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Guthrie
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.