Teams

Men of the Dam

Adult Tri-Level League · Men's Tri Level 3.0 to 4.0

2 players · average NTRP 4.00 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-10-28vs ParksideLost 01
L#1 DoublesButch Gorman / Chris Raiser vs David Knoblock / Scott Kober1-6, 1-6
2023-10-07vs GCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Raiser / John McShane vs Parker Kitterman / Ben Eisen1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Men's Tri Level 3.0 to 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hoffman Park6116512141
2UMLY Tri 4.05114411131
3Parkside5212921160
4WCGCC3361227174
5Naylor's Run 10.534101124197
6Upper Dublin0541124167
7Men of the Dam0521327167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Chris Raiser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Frederick Hoey
published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Raiser
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Frederick Hoey
24W–17L career · type S · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.