Teams

2023 18&Over- Palmas Roberto Guzman

Adult 18 & Over 2023 · 2023 18 & Over Mens 3.0 II

12 players · average NTRP 2.67 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#2 SinglesDavid Solis vs Jose Mejias3-6, 1-6
2023-06-24vs 2023 18&Over- CTH EricLost 01
L#1 SinglesDavid Solis vs Carlos Javier Sospedra Villalba2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDavid Solis vs Jose Ortuzar0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRoberto Guzman / David Solis vs ANGEL M MARTINEZ COLON / Jorge Martinez2-6, 4-6
2023-05-21vs 2023 18&Over- CTH EricLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Solis / Edward Ortiz Rivera vs Yamil Velazquez / Brandon Echevarria0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDavid Solis vs Eric Vega1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesLuis Pena / David Solis vs Rafael Cabrera / Jose Ortuzar1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2023 18 & Over Mens 3.0 II have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Jonathan Sieja
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
3.00
Peter Kozodoy
published
2.69
Luis Daniel Ramos
published
2.67
Luis Pena
published
2.54
Edward Ortiz Rivera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Fjodor Agranat
published 2.5
2.23
David Solis
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Ricardo Guzman
published
Roberto Guzman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edward Ortiz Rivera + Luis Pena3541% games+4.9% vs expected
Ricardo Guzman + Roberto Guzman1534% games−1.1% vs expected
Marcos Rodriguez Flores + David Solis1627% games−6.1% vs expected
Luis Daniel Ramos + David Solis134 matchesnot enough data
David Solis + Fjodor Agranat134 matchesnot enough data
Roberto Guzman + Roberto Emilio Guzman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Sieja
46W–19L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
Peter Kozodoy
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.00
Luis Daniel Ramos
21W–33L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
Luis Pena
30W–49L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Edward Ortiz Rivera
14W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
2.54
2.5
Fjodor Agranat
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
David Solis
22W–59L career · 7 lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.23
Jeffrey Schneeberger
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marcos Rodriguez Flores
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ricardo Guzman
10W–21L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Roberto Emilio Guzman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Roberto Guzman
5W–23L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.