Teams

DTC #2

2025 NTA ADULT FALL LEAGUE · 3.0 MEN

10 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-12-13vs RED ROCK CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesThomas Standish / Alonzo Henry vs Bernard Osullivan / Howard Rosenblatt4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesVictor Cardoza vs William Weber3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesFernando Prieto / Richard Hammel vs Morley Fulgencio / James Izeluk2-6, 1-6
2025-12-06vs DRAGONRIDGE CCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCharles Mendoza / Thomas Standish vs Shane Harley / Bradley Foreman2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesVictor Cardoza vs Chong Choi1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesFernando Prieto / Richard Hammel vs Chris Marlin / David Dellett6-1, 7-5
2025-12-01vs DTC #4Won 10
W#1 DoublesRichard Hammel / Thomas Standish vs Paul Mazur / Kirk Moll4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-08vs CLUB RIDGESLost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Schilling / Fernando Prieto vs Mitchell Pohlman / Teddy Ton3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesVictor Cardoza vs Sean Ono Jr.6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-11-01vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GVLost 02
L#1 DoublesFernando Prieto / Richard Hammel vs Robert Bravin / John Ritz2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesVictor Cardoza vs Saiakshaj Paturu1-6, 4-6
2025-10-25vs ALL AMERICAN TENNIS CENTERLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlonzo Henry / James Schilling vs Nabil Nassri / Ryan Millbern6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesVictor Cardoza vs Jose Despujos Cardillo6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesFernando Prieto / Thomas Standish vs John Ivan Bauzon / Kelly Williams6-7, 2-6
2025-10-17vs DTC #3Lost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Standish / Fernando Prieto vs Brian Brancato / Justin Chang7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2025-10-04vs RED ROCK CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCharles Mendoza / Fernando Prieto vs Howard Rosenblatt / William Weber4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesVictor Cardoza vs Vishisht Mehta6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlonzo Henry / Thomas Standish vs Bernard Osullivan / Reagan Weber4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-09-27vs DRAGONRIDGE CCLost 13
L#1 DoublesJames Schilling / Charles Mendoza vs Joe Grusman / Craig Weaver6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesVictor Cardoza vs Chris Marlin6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAlonzo Henry / Richard Hammel vs Bradley Foreman / Shane Harley0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Standish / Allen Hawkes vs Ralph Beck / Chong Choi2-6, 2-6
2025-09-20vs DTC #4Lost 02
L#1 DoublesThomas Standish / James Schilling vs Jayson DiMizio / Keegan Sullivan7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCharles Mendoza vs Zhao Lang3-6, 2-6
2025-09-12vs DTC #1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesFernando Prieto / James Schilling vs Daniel Pursel / Michael Bauwens0-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesVictor Cardoza vs Zachary Austin6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAllen Hawkes / Charles Mendoza vs Johnny Underwood / John Abihider1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alonzo Henry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Brian P Curtin
published 3
2.72
Victor Cardoza
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.64
Charles Mendoza
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.44
Thomas Standish
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
DC Collins
published 2.5
Fernando Prieto
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
John Terry
published
Michael Gifford
published
Richard Hammel
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Standish + Richard Hammel2444% games+3.8% vs expected
Fernando Prieto + Thomas Standish61345% games+0.8% vs expected
Michael Gifford + John Terry6947% games−5.1% vs expected
Michael Gifford + Thomas Standish4546% games−8.2% vs expected
Fernando Prieto + Richard Hammel1435% games−11.9% vs expected
Michael Gifford + Fernando Prieto224 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Standish + John Terry044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alonzo Henry
11W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Brian P Curtin
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Victor Cardoza
65W–123L career · 8 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Charles Mendoza
18W–44L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Thomas Standish
64W–106L career · 8 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
2.5
DC Collins
18W–23L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Fernando Prieto
31W–70L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Terry
45W–71L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Gifford
62W–73L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Hammel
7W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.