Teams

The Shot Sisters

2021 Tri-One Doubles League · 4.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-09-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesErica Chong / Noriko Tamamoto vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-09-11vs Shot GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Rush Lee / Praphaporn Downing vs Cheryl Yoshida / Melissa Agena6-4, 6-2
2021-09-04vs Team Mika-chanWon 10
W#1 DoublesErica Chong / Noriko Tamamoto vs Saori Morio / Tomoko Balbirona6-3, 6-2
2021-08-28vs ChocopolitanWon 10
W#1 DoublesErica Chong / Noriko Tamamoto vs Katherine Warner / Shannon Oba1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-08-22vs Ruru-TriLost 01
L#1 DoublesPraphaporn Downing / Jacqueline Rush Lee vs Holly Toguchi / Hanha Youn1-6, 0-6
2021-08-14vs Team V2Won 10
W#1 DoublesJoanna Kappel / Noriko Tamamoto vs Sonnie Koko / Cori Takimoto6-4, 6-4
2021-08-07vs Shot GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Rush Lee / Praphaporn Downing vs Jo Ann Hirata / Melissa Agena6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2021-07-31vs Team Mika-chanLost 01
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Rush Lee / Kaneko Bell vs Mika Murakami / Yuriko Christopher3-6, 2-6
2021-07-24vs ChocopolitanLost 01
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Rush Lee / Praphaporn Downing vs Shannon Oba / Tiffany Akiyama4-6, 4-6
2021-07-17vs Ruru-TriLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoanna Kappel / Noriko Tamamoto vs Carol Mau / Holly Toguchi4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ruru-Tri9191249
2Team Mika-chan55551099
3The Shot Sisters55551191
4Chocopolitan464613104
5Team V236361399

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Kaneko Bell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Praphaporn Downing
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jacqueline Rush Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Noriko Tamamoto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Joanna Kappel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Erica Chong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Noriko Tamamoto + Joanna Kappel5251% games−1.7% vs expected
Jacqueline Rush Lee + Praphaporn Downing1636% games−3.4% vs expected
Noriko Tamamoto + Erica Chong303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kaneko Bell
116W–94L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.91
Praphaporn Downing
79W–100L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Jacqueline Rush Lee
28W–27L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Noriko Tamamoto
90W–59L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Joanna Kappel
102W–40L career · 2 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Erica Chong
53W–42L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.