Teams

Rye Racquet - 18+ 4.5 W - Stallions

2026 18&Over Women · 4.5

22 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-20vs CRRC Dexter's Girls 18+ 4.5WLost 13
L#1 DoublesLouise Fischer / Loren Dinger vs Yvonne Lenzen / Kellie Mee1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Bevilacqua / Jani Mason vs Jamie Taffet / Vanessa Lam-Tran2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesVictoria Williams vs Karen Gill2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Thompson / Valery Frissora vs Jessica Ulrich / Caroline Dunlop3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesSamantha Boardman / Hope Foley vs Naomi Proctor / Laura Emerson6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJulie Colson vs Anastasiya Dasik2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLoren Dinger / Valery Frissora vs Sarah Haas / Diane Luftig6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKristen Bevilacqua / Anne Teillon vs Rachel Gigliotti / Courtney McKinney6-4, 6-2
2026-06-29vs CRRC Dexter's Girls 18+ 4.5WWon 31
W#1 DoublesMarcela Castro / Samantha Boardman vs Kellie Mee / Yvonne Lenzen7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJulie Colson vs Karen Gill4-6, 5-4
W#2 DoublesHope Foley / Loren Dinger vs Xue Petrov / Caroline Dunlop6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJani Mason / Kristina Dorfman vs Jennifer Schnitzer / Sylvia Gross2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-06-22vs Grand Slam - 18+ 4.5 WWon 31
W#1 DoublesSamantha Boardman / Marcela Castro vs Elina Kapostina / Tara Blanchard7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Thompson / Kristen Bevilacqua vs Cinta Delmonaco-Kemp / Daniela Pino6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJulie Colson vs Scottie Guerney6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnnie O'Connor / Victoria Williams vs Holly Moskow / Kathryn Geiger4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-15vs Armonk Domes 18+ 4.5WSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMarcela Castro / Jani Mason vs Eileen Allers / Wenchun Wu6-7, 5-5
L#1 SinglesMichelle Kanter vs Rachel Turri0-1
W#2 DoublesKristina Dorfman / Kristen Bevilacqua vs Heather Rice / Meghan Martucci6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Teillon / Valery Frissora vs Katharina Lewis / Heike Martens1-2
W#1 DoublesKristen Bevilacqua / Jani Mason vs Carole Allers / Kate Kelly6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKristina Dorfman / Valery Frissora vs Diane Luftig / Donna Morrison6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMika Homma vs Amanda Fialk1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCamilla Keighery / Annie O'Connor vs Naomi Proctor / Lori Calat3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-18vs Grand Slam - 18+ 4.5 WSplit 22
W#1 DoublesValery Frissora / Louise Fischer vs Darian Schwartz / Jiyon Lee2-6, 5-0
W#2 DoublesJani Mason / Kristen Bevilacqua vs Tara Blanchard / Jennifer Monachino-Lapey6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMika Homma vs Rachelle Theise1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKristina Dorfman / Camilla Keighery vs Whitney Maurer / Emilie Chang6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-05-04vs Armonk Domes 18+ 4.5WWon 31
L#1 DoublesMarcela Castro / Loren Dinger vs Amy Guttman / Jacqueline Clark6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLouise Fischer / Valery Frissora vs Sara Shapiro / Wenchun Wu2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichelle Kanter vs Allison Umbricht6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Thompson / Hope Foley vs Jane Kim / Heike Martens2-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Samantha Boardman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
4.41
Marcela Castro
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
4.28
Louise Fischer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.26
Jani Mason
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Christie Manning
published 4.5
4.24
Michelle Kanter
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
4.23
Julie Colson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.23
Loren Dinger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.21
Hope Foley
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Kristina Dorfman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.15
Victoria Williams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
4.15
Kristen Bevilacqua
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
4.14
Melissa Shaw
published
4.12
Carol Powers
published 4.5
4.12
Mika Homma
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
4.06
Camilla Keighery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Annie O'Connor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Jorrie Bruffett
published
3.93
Sarah Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.92
Anne Teillon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Valery Frissora
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Julie Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristina Dorfman + Camilla Keighery6256% games+6.7% vs expected
Jani Mason + Kristen Bevilacqua25858% games+6.1% vs expected
Julie Anderson + Camilla Keighery6250% games+5.3% vs expected
Hope Foley + Victoria Williams8256% games+4.9% vs expected
Sarah Thompson + Melissa Shaw201453% games+3.7% vs expected
Marcela Castro + Loren Dinger6260% games+2.7% vs expected
Kristina Dorfman + Kristen Bevilacqua4450% games+2.7% vs expected
Anne Teillon + Victoria Williams211156% games+2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samantha Boardman
41W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
4.43
Marcela Castro
111W–50L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.41
4.5
Louise Fischer
93W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.28
Jani Mason
113W–60L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Christie Manning
52W–41L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Kanter
46W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.24
Julie Colson
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
Loren Dinger
84W–54L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Hope Foley
70W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
4.21
Kristina Dorfman
60W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
4.17
Victoria Williams
58W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
4.15
Kristen Bevilacqua
132W–68L career · 6 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
4.15
Melissa Shaw
125W–74L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Carol Powers
59W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
4.12
Mika Homma
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Camilla Keighery
131W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Annie O'Connor
81W–72L career · 2 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
4.03
Jorrie Bruffett
165W–95L career · no lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.94
4.5
Sarah Thompson
173W–150L career · 3 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.93
4.5
Anne Teillon
118W–82L career · 2 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.92
Valery Frissora
13W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.92
Julie Anderson
102W–67L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.