Teams

SDNC 7.0 Morgan Run/ Filicia

2021 Mixed Doubles 40 & Over Spring - SDNC · SDNC - 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.43 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#3 DoublesEdna Mattei / Bill Sudlow vs Ann Ortel / Jeff Kelleher6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDanna Dickson / Michael Vaughan vs Christine Tangarie / Emmanuel de Seroux6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEdna Mattei / Bruce Danielson vs Diana Clark / Michael McGowan6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesMichael Vaughan / Danna Dickson vs Ross Watkins / Amie Destremps3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-04-17vs SDNC 7.0 Morgan Run/ SchrottLost 01
L#2 DoublesBill Sudlow / Danna Dickson vs Tim Miller / Robyn Rice6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesEdna Mattei / Bill Sudlow vs Nancy Picunko / Robert Picunko6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEdna Mattei / Bill Sudlow vs Daniel Morilak / Anne Case6-7, 4-6
L#1 DoublesBill Sudlow / Edna Mattei vs Kristina Leedom / Edward Kardas6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMichael Vaughan / Danna Dickson vs Carlie Pasha Berke / Jeff Kelleher7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEdna Mattei / Bill Sudlow vs Sam Savage / CORRI HARVEY4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Edna Mattei
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.39
Jim Filicia
published 3.5
3.36
Danna Dickson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Bruce Danielson
published 3.5
3.20
Michelle Atkinson
published
3.20
Bill Sudlow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
2.87
Phillip Schneider
published
2.73
Eileen Gonzalez
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Atkinson + Bruce Danielson11259% games+15.5% vs expected
Edna Mattei + Bill Sudlow4555% gamesnot enough data
Jim Filicia + Danna Dickson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edna Mattei
45W–46L career · 6 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.50
3.5
Jim Filicia
108W–90L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Danna Dickson
47W–25L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Bruce Danielson
16W–8L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
Michelle Atkinson
17W–7L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Bill Sudlow
53W–108L career · 6 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Jurgita Chachisvilis
33W–41L career · no lines in 2021
<1%44%56%
3.02
Phillip Schneider
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
84%16%<1%
2.87
3
Eileen Gonzalez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
Mirianas Chachisvilis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.