Teams

TCSP-Racqueteers-Benko

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

17 players · average NTRP 2.93 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-23vs TUK-Au-YeungLost 05
L#1 DoublesDion Hutchings / Drew Pounds vs Lik Wong / Rizwan Ahmed2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTim Ong vs Andrei Cheremukhin0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Cotta / Travis Vail vs Timothy Lam / Keith Jerome4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesHrvoje Benko vs Arohan Ajit2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Rose / Brent Baker vs Salim Peshawaria / Jeremy Jones2-6, 5-7
2026-05-17vs ETC-Team2 3.0M-BoxLost 05
L#1 DoublesDrew Pounds / Dion Hutchings vs Andrew Buchanan / Matthew Campbell5-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesEric Stoll vs Filip Mamic0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Cotta / Travis Vail vs Daniel Do / Yi Cai5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesTim Ong vs Ian Herrera3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrent Baker / Andrew Pollack vs Mac Pinski / Ravdeep Pasricha2-6, 0-6
2026-05-10vs BC-LinLost 13
L#1 DoublesAndrew Pollack / Chester Weir vs Thane Liffick / Craighton Goeppele3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesThomas Barbano vs Jack Kelly0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrent Baker / Drew Pounds vs C Todd Rentschler / Jason Holm1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEmil Bova / Paul Rose vs Lei Tian / Teng Gu6-3, 6-0
2026-05-03vs PSC-2026-18+ ZhouLost 05
L#1 DoublesMichael Cotta / Michael Ford vs Bo Zhang / David Zhao4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesChester Weir vs Ales Novak4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGeoffrey Buscher / Christopher Landman vs Davis Feng / David Jacobson1-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesThomas Barbano vs Zhihang Liu1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Rose / Travis Vail vs Suman Sadanand Narambrath / Li Xia1-6, 1-6
2026-04-24vs NWW-ETC-LiLost 14
W#1 DoublesChester Weir / Thomas Barbano vs Xudong Li / Fangda Xu6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesEric Stoll vs Harold Wu1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEmil Bova / Travis Vail vs Simon Zhang / Zhengyang Deng0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTim Ong vs Jiafang Liu2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBrent Baker / Daniel Pensak vs Norito Jin / Leo Liu3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-19vs EDG-Warriors-MoosmanLost 05
L#1 DoublesEric Stoll / Paul Rose vs Niels Kirkegaard / Scott Robertson1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesChester Weir vs Paul Moosman1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMichael Ford / Drew Pounds vs Joel Higgins / Ticson MacH6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMichael Cotta vs Aaron Horton0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHrvoje Benko / Christopher Landman vs Thomas Hei / Darren Carrido6-7, 6-7
2026-04-04vs STC-Slammin Salmons-StrobleLost 05
L#1 DoublesThomas Barbano / Michael Ford vs Rob Hendry / Grahm Satterwhite1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesEric Stoll vs Patrick Donovan3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Rose / Andrew Pollack vs Ian Brown / Matt Champagne2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesTim Ong vs Dan Swanson0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEmil Bova / Dion Hutchings vs Matthew Kane / Gavin Curtis1-6, 0-6
2026-03-28vs WSC-NairLost 05
L#1 DoublesChester Weir / Dion Hutchings vs Mark Litton / Stephen Daniel0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesChristopher Landman vs Yen-Yu Lee3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDrew Pounds / Hrvoje Benko vs GREG STERNE / Bala Nair4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesTim Ong vs Ivan Hernandez Serrano2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTravis Vail / Geoffrey Buscher vs Huai-Ping Lee / William Miao0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Daniel Pensak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Drew Pounds
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.60
Paul Rose
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.56
Chester Weir
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.55
Travis Vail
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.54
Thomas Barbano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.53
Tim Ong
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.52
Christopher Landman
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Hrvoje Benko
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Michael Cotta
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.48
Eric Stoll
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.42
Brent Baker
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.41
Andrew Pollack
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.37
Emil Bova
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.36
Geoffrey Buscher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.10
Dion Hutchings
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Michael Ford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brent Baker + Hrvoje Benko4452% games+13.2% vs expected
Paul Rose + Chester Weir1641% games+5.9% vs expected
Brent Baker + Chester Weir2642% games−1.7% vs expected
Geoffrey Buscher + Emil Bova11034% games−4.2% vs expected
Paul Rose + Emil Bova2343% gamesnot enough data
Paul Rose + Brent Baker044 matchesnot enough data
Geoffrey Buscher + Brent Baker134 matchesnot enough data
Geoffrey Buscher + Chester Weir134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Daniel Pensak
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Drew Pounds
1W–7L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Paul Rose
22W–85L career · 5 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Chester Weir
17W–61L career · 5 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Travis Vail
4W–26L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.55
3
Thomas Barbano
19W–41L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.54
Tim Ong
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Christopher Landman
10W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.52
3
Hrvoje Benko
26W–64L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
Michael Cotta
4W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.50
3
Eric Stoll
1W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Brent Baker
15W–82L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.42
3
Andrew Pollack
0W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.41
3
Emil Bova
6W–48L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.37
2.5
Geoffrey Buscher
13W–82L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.36
2.5
Dion Hutchings
7W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Michael Ford
13W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.