Teams

11 TCRC Wade

2022 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-27vs 4 Westwood WatkinsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Edmondson / Marineth Kight vs Heather Harker / Kristy Seredni0-6, 1-6
2022-08-23vs 9 SCC Sal’s Berries JamisonLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarineth Kight / Lisa Loudermilk vs Becky McNeer / Melissa Brunner-Brown6-7, 5-7
2022-07-31vs 10 Avalon GeorgeLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmanda Edmondson / Marineth Kight vs Alice Broaddus / Monica Ghita6-7, 3-6
2022-07-24Won 10
W#3 DoublesAmanda Edmondson / C Suzanne Finley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-17vs 6 ACAC Davis 6.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAmanda Edmondson / Anne Hennessey vs Katy Bassler / Irene Quilez1-6, 2-6
2022-07-14vs 5 Bon Air MetzSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKatherine Mortimer / Marineth Kight vs Jeanne Albright / Deanne Ralston6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichele Asher / Amanda Edmondson vs Robin Balsamo / Lynette Villadelgado6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Donna Wade
published 3.5
3.15
Donna Hall
published 3.5
3.11
Felicia Schooley
published 3.5
3.05
Marineth Kight
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Lisa Loudermilk
published
2.92
Katherine Mortimer
published
2.86
Rochelle Preston
published
2.83
Amanda Edmondson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.77
C Suzanne Finley
published 3
Anne Hennessey
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Hall + Katherine Mortimer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Donna Wade
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Donna Hall
13W–21L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Felicia Schooley
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Marineth Kight
118W–61L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.05
Lisa Loudermilk
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
Katherine Mortimer
7W–21L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
2.92
Rochelle Preston
7W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Amanda Edmondson
27W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
C Suzanne Finley
8W–20L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Anne Hennessey
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.