Teams

MDaubert-DFC

2026 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Eve

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 10 6:30 PM
Duke University Faculty Club
Sep 17 6:30 PM
Southern Village Club LLC
Sep 24 6:30 PM
Whippoorwill Park
Oct 1 6:30 PM
Duke University Faculty Club
Oct 8 6:30 PM
Southern Boundaries Tennis Courts
2026-08-27vs CAvery.7.5C-CHTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesChrista McGill / Beth Anderson vs Elizabeth McNamara / Jennifer Mersereau2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Carlson / Meta Kuehn vs Andy Blackburn / Jenny Perry1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Daubert / Diane Allen vs Sheridan Meltsner / Melissa Fitzpatrick1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-08-20vs LBible.7.5C-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesChrista McGill / Adriana Doi vs Elaine Hudson / Keshia Green4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusie Post-Rust / Amy Johnston vs Hannah Boghosian / Alison Sinclair6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeanne Murray / Melissa Daubert vs Liz Chen / Ragini Singh3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LKulp.7.5C-SVC103008
2KLaan-DUR1030118
3LBible.7.5C-DUR1030228
4CHaywood-DUR1021329
5SFranks.7.5C-DUR1021330
6MEasterling18C-HVCC1021332
7TPerrone-DUR1021433
8CBaddour.18C-CHCC0112428
9CAvery.7.5C-CHTC0112430
10JRoss.7.5C-DUR0112531
11KEvans-DUR0112535
12MDaubert-DFC0103633
13MLong.7.5C-DUR0103635
14GArtis-DUR0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Susie Post-Rust
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Christa McGill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Amy Johnston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Melissa Daubert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Jeanne Murray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Lindsey Wu
published
2.92
Adriana Doi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Emily McClernon
published 3
2.85
Meta Kuehn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meta Kuehn + Adriana Doi2931% games−12.6% vs expected
Jeanne Murray + Meta Kuehn033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Susie Post-Rust
81W–93L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Christa McGill
119W–123L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.58
3.5
Amy Johnston
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
Melissa Daubert
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.07
Jeanne Murray
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Lindsey Wu
14W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3.5
Adriana Doi
38W–89L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Emily McClernon
12W–14L career · type S · no lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Meta Kuehn
64W–113L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.