Teams

Cuba/18/6.5/CWD/CCL

2025 BR Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 6.5 BR (18&O) Women Day

21 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-11vs Williams/18/6.5/CWD/LEGWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaurie Linehan / Valerie DeBosier vs Tiffany Guitreau / Jennifer Maltbie6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarcy Bernard / Alison Rodrigue vs Erica Allain / Aimee Townsend6-1, 6-3
2025-09-14vs Williams/18/6.5/CWD/LEGLost 12
W#1 DoublesSummer Soileau / Katie South vs Carmen Lavergne / Jennifer Maltbie6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJessica Cuba / Charlotte Smith vs Carly Whatley / Kasey Eglin2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNicole LaNasa / Rondi Cowart vs Mary Barham / Katie Williams5-7, 2-6
2025-09-12vs Rogers/18/6.5/CWD/BRECWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatie South / Valerie DeBosier vs Sissy Rogers / Alice Devall6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLindsey Whittle / Charlotte Smith vs Kami Lambe / Jessica Antilley6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLaurie Ginn / Marsha Jumonville vs Kemper Rogers / Keri Teague4-6, 4-6
2025-08-01vs Rogers/18/6.5/CWD/BRECWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatie South / Candace Mula vs Sissy Rogers / Kemper Rogers6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarcy Bernard / Summer Soileau vs Kami Lambe / Amy Sylvester6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarsha Jumonville / Charlotte Smith vs Amy Maggio / Jessica Antilley6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 BR (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Laurie Linehan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Randi Peltier
published
3.27
Lindsey Whittle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Katie South
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Rachel Dellucci
published
3.19
Kristy Parks
published
3.18
Jessica Cuba
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Nicole LaNasa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Summer Soileau
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Marcy Bernard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Marsha Jumonville
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Valerie DeBosier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Rondi Cowart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Candace Mula
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Terri Baldwin
published
Alison Rodrigue
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Annie Brock
published 3
Crystal Donovan
published 3
2.65
Laurie Ginn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Nicole DeMoss
published
Joanne Harvey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie DeBosier + Laurie Linehan4262% games+14.4% vs expected
Jessica Cuba + Laurie Linehan5354% games+7.1% vs expected
Nicole LaNasa + Jessica Cuba3248% gamesnot enough data
Rachel Dellucci + Lindsey Whittle224 matchesnot enough data
Terri Baldwin + Laurie Ginn123 matchesnot enough data
Rondi Cowart + Summer Soileau213 matchesnot enough data
Nicole LaNasa + Lindsey Whittle123 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Cuba + Rachel Dellucci123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurie Linehan
27W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.42
Randi Peltier
24W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Lindsey Whittle
18W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Katie South
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Rachel Dellucci
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Kristy Parks
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Jessica Cuba
18W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Nicole LaNasa
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Summer Soileau
24W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Marcy Bernard
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Marsha Jumonville
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Valerie DeBosier
14W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Rondi Cowart
20W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%25%
2.91
3
Candace Mula
13W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Terri Baldwin
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Alison Rodrigue
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Annie Brock
1W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Crystal Donovan
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laurie Ginn
17W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Nicole DeMoss
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
Joanne Harvey
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.