Teams

BMarks (Providence CC)

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-24vs DToomey/ASauls (Olde Providence)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAnna Troppmann / Maggie Webb vs Kim Walsh / Ginger Daly6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKate Schumacher / Amy Eades vs Megan Bimbo / Christina McWilliams3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Sofsian / Brooke Hassell vs Naomi O'Brien / Krista Wainscott0-6, 0-6
2026-08-17vs DGreenaway/HJohnson (Life Time)Won 21
L#1 DoublesBrandi Marks / Maggie Webb vs Anna McLaughlin / Stacey Reinhardt2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMaggie Wheeler / Jennifer Little vs Tiffany Kopittke / Lea Powell6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Richards / Kate Schumacher vs Anna Gallup / Bilan Mo6-1, 6-3
2026-08-10vs MEccleston/JMcNally (Life Time)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAshley Sofsian / Lisa Long vs Jenny Kim / Sabrina Gregory2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Hua Shaul / Maggie Webb vs Olya Banchik / Madelaine LeBlanc4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly French / Brandi Marks vs Sonia Waters / Felicia Ahn1-6, 4-6
2026-08-03vs VSchaeffer/JRoberts (OPRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMaggie Wheeler / Anna Troppmann vs Laura Clancy / Virginia Papadopulos2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Hassell / Amy Eades vs Katie Haywood / Josey Waleski1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Little / Carla Ackels vs Amy Bundrick / Katrina Schellhorn7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Brooke Hassell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Anna Troppmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Brandi Marks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Kate Schumacher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Amy Eades
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Megan Hua Shaul
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Ashley Sofsian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Maggie Webb
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Maggie Wheeler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Carla Ackels
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
Laura Richards
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brandi Marks + Anna Troppmann10455% games−0.9% vs expected
Carla Ackels + Laura Richards4448% games−1.9% vs expected
Ashley Sofsian + Anna Troppmann14657% games−2.4% vs expected
Brandi Marks + Ashley Sofsian6848% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Sofsian + Carla Ackels4155% gamesnot enough data
Maggie Webb + Kate Schumacher224 matchesnot enough data
Brandi Marks + Amy Eades123 matchesnot enough data
Carla Ackels + Amy Eades213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brooke Hassell
57W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Anna Troppmann
83W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Brandi Marks
96W–62L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Kate Schumacher
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.32
3.5
Amy Eades
45W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Megan Hua Shaul
57W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Ashley Sofsian
109W–75L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Maggie Webb
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
Maggie Wheeler
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Carla Ackels
94W–97L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Laura Richards
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.