Teams

Di.Williams40A

2024 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-02vs Di.Allen40ALost 12
L#1 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Elisebeth Gelardi vs Susie EL-Kaissi / Natalie Regan0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCarly Kouskolekas / Laurie Reiss vs Susan Hembarsky / Sherry Ingle6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDeborah Brazee / Kim Gottshall vs Daphne Driscoll / Nancy Gugliotta3-6, 4-6
2024-04-26vs Ja.Kerzner40ALost 12
L#1 DoublesJoan Faulkner / Kim Gottshall vs Julie Sauls / Aliza Bricklin0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Kucyk / Phoebe Hill vs Anne Iannucci / Darlene Miller3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJocelyn Badulis / Laurie Compiano vs Joy Cooper / Angie Bazemore2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-04-25vs Ly.Clark40AWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoan Faulkner / Deborah Brazee vs Alena Minarikova / Julie Karg6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaurie Compiano / Laurie Reiss vs Elizabeth Black / Lynelle Clark5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2024-04-18vs Al.Sheehan40ALost 12
W#1 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Elisebeth Gelardi vs Lisa Gwyn / Rebecca Bennett7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDeborah Brazee / Kim Gottshall vs Mary Dee Smith / Allison Sheehan5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLaurie Reiss / Diane Williams vs Martha Schneider / Nancy Baird7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-03-21vs De.Turner40AWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoan Faulkner / Carly Kouskolekas vs Bunny Ratledge / Susan Dubach6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLaurie Compiano / Laurie Reiss vs Allison Smith / Tyler Cunningham6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesElisebeth Gelardi / Diane Williams vs Alison Bernhardt / Jennifer Fogleman6-0, 6-2
2024-03-20vs Sh.Cole40AWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaurie Reiss / Carly Kouskolekas vs Marylou Salmon / Vickie Fuller6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPhoebe Hill / Sharon Kucyk vs Megan Black / Amy Cagle6-3, 6-2
2024-03-14vs Sa.Park40ALost 03
L#1 DoublesElisebeth Gelardi / Beverly Rubin vs Ann Gray / Amy Rogers4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJocelyn Badulis / Joan Faulkner vs Sandra Park / Claire Little0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Brazee / Kim Gottshall vs Casey Hale / Katherine Henry2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
3.44
Elisebeth Gelardi
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Joan Faulkner
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.20
Jocelyn Badulis
published
3.15
Laurie Reiss
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Deborah Brazee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.89
Kim Gottshall
published
2.80
Sharon Kucyk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Laurie Compiano
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.73
Beverly Rubin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Phoebe Hill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elisebeth Gelardi + Laurie Reiss6259% games+9.4% vs expected
Elisebeth Gelardi + Beverly Rubin3546% games−8.3% vs expected
Laurie Compiano + Laurie Reiss6353% gamesnot enough data
Joan Faulkner + Laurie Reiss303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carly Kouskolekas
69W–39L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.94
3.5
Elisebeth Gelardi
97W–87L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Joan Faulkner
69W–72L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Jocelyn Badulis
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Laurie Reiss
234W–202L career · 5 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Deborah Brazee
114W–88L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Kim Gottshall
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
2.89
3
Sharon Kucyk
110W–118L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Laurie Compiano
45W–71L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Beverly Rubin
85W–106L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Phoebe Hill
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.