Teams

Westfield

2025 18&over Women Day Winter · 3.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.35 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-20vs Double TroubleWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Peters / Egle Jokubauskyte vs Melissa Mauro-Duffy / Esther Wendling6-1, 6-1
2025-03-06vs NJ: Shot GirlsLost 04
L#1 DoublesMargo Deserio / Amanda Lieberman vs Maya Furumoto / Jamie Kovac1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDanielle Fried vs Hannah Finkelberg4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesEgle Jokubauskyte / Melissa Peters vs Kazumi Otake / Keiko Chhaya4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesFaena Youngquist / Jamie Furia vs Susan Lee / Geri Arnell0-6, 0-6
2025-02-27vs Centercourt ChathamLost 01
L#1 DoublesMargo Deserio / Egle Jokubauskyte vs Sinead Bennett / Andrea Kayyali1-6, 1-6
2025-02-13vs Murray HillLost 01
L#2 DoublesEgle Jokubauskyte / Melissa Peters vs Jaime Levine / Jodi Burns3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-01-30vs FairfieldWon 10
W#2 DoublesEgle Jokubauskyte / Melissa Peters vs Niki Chen / Dina Ferluge6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-23vs No Drama MamasWon 10
W#2 DoublesEgle Jokubauskyte / Melissa Peters vs Christiane Mahoney / Nedenia Craig5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Danielle Fried
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Egle Jokubauskyte
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Alison Leibowitz
published 3.5
Amanda Lieberman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Carly Edelson
published 3.5
Danielle Okas
published 3.5
Dena Murphy
published 3.5
3.21
Melissa Peters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Jenny Madden
published
2.88
Faena Youngquist
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Jamie Furia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Alexis Altberg
published 3
Candice Dalin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Corrine Heroux
published 3
2.69
Sarah Faust
published
Elina Kott
published
Lisa Miele
published
Margo Deserio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Perlman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Stefanie Stolnick
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stefanie Stolnick + Faena Youngquist8459% games+7.8% vs expected
Amanda Lieberman + Danielle Fried1538% games−0.8% vs expected
Alexis Altberg + Candice Dalin121549% games−1.3% vs expected
Dena Murphy + Danielle Okas2348% games−4.6% vs expected
Amanda Lieberman + Dena Murphy2339% games−8.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danielle Fried
13W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Egle Jokubauskyte
94W–55L career · 10 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Alison Leibowitz
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Amanda Lieberman
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carly Edelson
18W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Danielle Okas
24W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dena Murphy
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Peters
14W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Jenny Madden
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Faena Youngquist
16W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Jamie Furia
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Alexis Altberg
20W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Candice Dalin
22W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Corrine Heroux
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Faust
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Elina Kott
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Miele
26W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Margo Deserio
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Perlman
7W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stefanie Stolnick
19W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.