Teams

PRC BLUE

2023 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-08vs GAC YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristen Crookshanks / Cynthia Kruger vs Ann Baer / Laura Routh2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Manassee Buell / Debra St John vs Debra Benge / Elizabeth Restivo6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-07-25vs SS-LT BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesCynthia Kruger / Denise Debartolomeis vs Jennifer Cree / Samantha Kirschke3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDebra St John / Julie Heck vs Ellen Thompson / Michelle Rubin6-3, 7-5
2023-07-18vs HRCA-N REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Heck / Liz Holt vs Danielle Butler / Helen Lazzell3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDebra St John / Kristen Crookshanks vs Sandy Stocker / Carmel Walz2-6, 2-6
2023-07-18vs CACI BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Manassee Buell / Wendy Mathewson vs Melinda Conover / Kristen Arsenault4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLiz Holt / Kristen Crookshanks vs Karen Eagleton / Sherri Hartman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-07-11vs SS-H BLUELost 02
L#1 SinglesLiz Holt vs Debbie Maloney0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDenise Debartolomeis / Sujata Wagh vs Heidi David / Lisa Zook0-6, 4-6
2023-06-27vs LEBTC GREYWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Rosen / Henriette Nash vs Leann Washabaugh / Heather Coker0-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesWendy Mathewson vs Christy Dobson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDenise Debartolomeis / Julie Heck vs Sandi Plude / Alice Soderman7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Kristen Crookshanks
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Cynthia Kruger
published 3.5
3.19
Liz Holt
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Wendy Mathewson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Julie Heck
published
3.07
Denise Debartolomeis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Debra St John
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Henriette Nash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Sujata Wagh
published
2.90
Linda Manassee Buell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Debartolomeis + Debra St John263347% games−1.8% vs expected
Linda Manassee Buell + Wendy Mathewson121649% games−2.3% vs expected
Henriette Nash + Linda Manassee Buell61743% games−2.8% vs expected
Denise Debartolomeis + Liz Holt2540% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Crookshanks + Liz Holt1445% gamesnot enough data
Henriette Nash + Liz Holt3254% gamesnot enough data
Denise Debartolomeis + Cynthia Kruger134 matchesnot enough data
Debra St John + Linda Manassee Buell044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kristen Crookshanks
67W–74L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Cynthia Kruger
12W–19L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Liz Holt
40W–45L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Wendy Mathewson
84W–54L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Julie Heck
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Denise Debartolomeis
83W–107L career · 3 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Debra St John
77W–78L career · 3 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Henriette Nash
68W–128L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.01
Sujata Wagh
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Linda Manassee Buell
78W–122L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.