Teams

Refunds

2025 Lake USTA Tri Level 18 & Over · Refunds

18 players · average NTRP 3.09 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refunds have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Linda Radovich
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.81
Lola Terry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Tim Bain
published
3.57
Stephanie Schaeper
published
3.46
Margaret MacKie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Whitney Brunk
published 3.5
2.88
Brenda Kadlecik
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Rebecca Wilkins
published
2.70
ShariAnne McDermott
published
2.66
Lauren Conners
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Julie Giammattei
published
2.44
Lara Allen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.33
Inga Siler
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 2.5
2.19
Anna Marie Jackson
published 2.5
2.11
Laura Troyer
published 2.5
1.92
Stacy Swaney
published 2.5
Linda Fogel
published
Marybeth Schwartz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Inga Siler + Stacy Swaney1533% gamesnot enough data
Laura Troyer + Stacy Swaney0524% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Linda Radovich
85W–81L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.90
4
Lola Terry
33W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
Tim Bain
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Stephanie Schaeper
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Margaret MacKie
127W–90L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Whitney Brunk
61W–70L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Brenda Kadlecik
41W–69L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Rebecca Wilkins
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.77
ShariAnne McDermott
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Lauren Conners
22W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Julie Giammattei
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
3
Lara Allen
45W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
2.5
Inga Siler
31W–82L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Anna Marie Jackson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Laura Troyer
12W–59L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Stacy Swaney
16W–84L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Linda Fogel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marybeth Schwartz
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.