Teams

Gr.Christopher40C

2023 Cap Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-14vs Ed.King40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrian Lape / Brent Lamm vs Robert Caulfield / Michael Tadych6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Steele / Kenneth Lesher vs William Santa Rosa / John Rhoades6-1, 6-0
2023-09-07vs Br.Ross40CLost 01
L#3 DoublesKenneth Lesher / Thomas Sewitsky vs Rob Sellick / Kevin Nguyen1-6, 3-6
2023-08-31vs Ph.Gugliotta40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlessandro Montanari / Charlie Foster vs Philip Gugliotta / James Coblentz4-6, 1-6
2023-08-17vs La.Williams40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrent Lamm / Kenneth Lesher vs Jeffrey Pollack / Jason Widen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-10vs Ga.Fye40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrent Lamm / Richard Johnson vs Mike Kaelin / Matthew Durbin3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCharlie Foster / Alessandro Montanari vs Robert Marriott / Gary Fye6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2023-08-03vs Bi.Green40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Unruh / Kenneth Lesher vs Michael Gee / Jason McGeorge3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Brent Lamm
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.29
Alex Radulovic
published 3.5
3.27
Brett Woodson
published 3.5
David Steele
published 3.5
3.22
Matthew Fitzsimmons
published
3.15
Kenneth Lesher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.10
James Mellott
published
2.98
Alessandro Montanari
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Richard Johnson
published
2.70
Brian Lape
published 3
Vaibhav Parmar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alessandro Montanari + Kenneth Lesher6260% games+15.5% vs expected
Alessandro Montanari + Brent Lamm303 matchesnot enough data
Brent Lamm + Kenneth Lesher303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brent Lamm
153W–106L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Alex Radulovic
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Brett Woodson
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
David Steele
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Fitzsimmons
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Kenneth Lesher
51W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%14%86%
3.15
James Mellott
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Alessandro Montanari
102W–89L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%56%43%
2.98
Richard Johnson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Brian Lape
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
Vaibhav Parmar
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.