Teams

Bozeman Net Force

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over · Men 4.0 - 40 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.94 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-26vs Mostly Old GuysLost 13
L#1 DoublesMitch Overton / Justin Arndt vs Scott Selstad / Dave Richards2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesThomas Reynolds vs Stephen Rutherford6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrad Scheevel / Neil LeBlanc vs William Anderson / Craig Robinson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Keough / Kenneth Cisneros vs Dick Collum / Andy Hauser5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-25vs Mostly Old GuysLost 13
W#1 DoublesJohn Reenan / Thomas Reynolds vs Scott Selstad / Dave Richards4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJustin Arndt vs Thomas Shea3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMitch Overton / Kenneth Cisneros vs James Wilson / William Anderson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Delange / Matthew Keough vs Dick Collum / Andy Hauser1-6, 0-6
2026-07-25vs Montana Dreamin'Lost 13
W#1 DoublesJohn Reenan / Andrew Lenssen vs Silvio Wong / Jeremy Christensen6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesDavid Delange vs Alan Mcgrath0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCary Burg / Mitch Overton vs David Altfas / Andrew Chong0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNeil LeBlanc / Brad Scheevel vs Chad Alligood / Allan-Robert Peetsalu2-6, 0-6
2026-07-24vs Montana Dreamin'Lost 04
L#1 DoublesKenneth Cisneros / John Reenan vs Robert Hau / Andrew Nguyen4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesThomas Reynolds vs Thomas Sullivan2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJustin Arndt / Cary Burg vs Andrew Chong / David Altfas1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAndrew Lenssen / David Delange vs Chad Alligood / Alan Mcgrath2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 4.0 - 40 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana Dreamin'4011511104
2Mostly Old Guys2210616124
3Bozeman Net Force0431328182

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Andrew Lenssen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.84
John Reenan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Kenneth Cisneros
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Justin Arndt
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.73
Thomas Reynolds
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Matthew Keough
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Mitch Overton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Cary Burg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.18
David Delange
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Brad Scheevel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Neil LeBlanc
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Arndt + Cary Burg2639% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Lenssen
15W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
John Reenan
17W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Kenneth Cisneros
3W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Justin Arndt
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Thomas Reynolds
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Matthew Keough
2W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Mitch Overton
1W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Cary Burg
5W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
David Delange
0W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Brad Scheevel
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Neil LeBlanc
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.