Teams

LFTCS DESQUITADO

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-26vs PBCP FINEGOLDWon 10
W#1 DoublesMike Peterson / Robert Luthy vs Michael di Stasio / Bradley Gerler6-4, 6-2
2024-08-13vs MEMPK CASTOWon 10
W#1 DoublesPat Pottger / Mike Peterson vs Sean Milton / Hunter Renn6-3, 6-0
2024-08-06vs CSRC MCPHERSONSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRobert Luthy / Jason Bisanti vs Cody Hoggatt / Frank Coyle6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPat Pottger / Alex Praser vs John Buerschen / Grant Voyen3-6, 3-6
2024-07-30vs PBCP FINEGOLDWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobert Luthy / Lyubomir Lyubenov vs Randy Buck / Bradley Gerler6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDenton Desquitado / Pat Pottger vs Jason Richardson / Tyler Cruz6-0, 6-2
2024-07-23vs MEMPK CASTOSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRobert Luthy / Mike Peterson vs Hunter Renn / Sean Milton3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPat Pottger / Alex Praser vs Albert Wu / Patrick Ramirez6-1, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Noah Elliott
published
4.38
Jason Bisanti
published 4.5
4.36
Lyubomir Lyubenov
published
4.35
Robert Luthy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.34
Denton Desquitado
published 4.5
4.23
Pat Pottger
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.17
Mike Peterson
published
3.97
Alex Praser
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pat Pottger + Mike Peterson5062% games+7.0% vs expected
Mike Peterson + Robert Luthy2351% games+0.5% vs expected
Jason Bisanti + Pat Pottger303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noah Elliott
135W–46L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
4.42
4.5
Jason Bisanti
35W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
4.38
Lyubomir Lyubenov
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
4.36
5
Robert Luthy
53W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.35
4.5
Denton Desquitado
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
4.34
4.5
Pat Pottger
56W–60L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Mike Peterson
22W–13L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%1%
4.17
4
Alex Praser
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.